- Now that we have this, I wonder why could Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peru/Peer_review be useful for, any ideas? --Andersmusician VOTE 02:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Not every member of the wikiproject may want to participate in the AID, some may want to start or improve an article of they own. Then, they can nominate it to the Wikiproject review page for advice on how to further improve their creations. --Victor12 02:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Guidelines for Lima
Seeing as Lima will certainly be our next improvement drive, I think we should agree on some guidelines for editing, just for coordination. A good place to start could be Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Guideline, which is a proposal for a standarized city articles layout. It seems pretty good and we can always change whatever we don't like. We also need to agree on a standarized format for citations. Some options include using citation templates or the "short inline citation + bibliography section" system used in the Peru article. What do you think? --Victor12 10:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Time to mark Lima as current collaboration?
Hi, I think it's time to officialy mark Lima as our current collaboration. But who will take the lead?. AgainErick 18:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Now that you are saying it, we haven't specified a closing date for nominations, this is the place and time. --Andersmusician VOTE 03:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, we had July 5 for Lima. Since collabs are expected to run for three months, the next one would be October 5. --Victor12 03:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)