|This WikiProject is defunct.|
Consider looking for related projects for help or ask at the Teahouse.
If you feel this project may be worth reviving, please discuss with related projects first. Feel free to change this tag if the parameters were changed in error.
All nominations after March 3rd, 2011 are being considered for Version 0.9. We are still preparing templates and pages for the next release, but if you wish to make a nomination you may use follow the guidelines below for the time being.
Here, we determine which entries will compose the next offline Release Version, as part of the overall project of producing a fixed version of Wikipedia. This could be released on CD, DVD, paper, or some combination. Nominations here are ongoing, for whichever version is planned next, and nominations will be moved over to the next version page when it becomes available. Links that have a strikethrough are unavailable/defunct at present.
These entries will be selected based on importance and quality.
Miscellaneous | Arts | Everyday Life | Geography | History | Language & Communication | Life Sciences | Mathematics | Philosophy & Religion | Physical Sciences | Social Sciences & Society | Technology and Engineering
Eligibility for inclusion in the next Release Version
As of September 2011, this has yet to be decided.
Entries that are nominated will then be considered for inclusion on releases of Wikipedia the next offline release version of Wikipedia, as outlined below. Previous offline releases include:
If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. You may wish to receive feedback from your WikiProject before nominating an article here, or you may wish to list it at Wikipedia:Peer review. If the article is of high quality, you may want to nominate it for Featured article status.
The approval process
The approval process is designed to be simple, as is appropriate for a test release. Approval will simply involve one member of the editorial team reviewing the article using the criteria outlined above. The reviewer must not have been a major contributor to the article. You may sign up as a reviewer for the team here. If there are quality objections raised, the nomination will be removed from this list and archived. Once the objections have been addressed, you are encouraged to renominate the article. Articles deemed by the team to fail only on the criterion of "importance" will be listed at the held nominations page, for consideration in later releases. Articles that are approved will automatically be submitted for future general releases.
For reviewers of currently nominated articles
If the article under review meets the criteria for approval:
Fail on importance only
If the article is of acceptable quality, but on a topic outside the scope of the latest release:
Fail on quality
If the article fails to meet the criteria because of quality issues:
There is now a list of nominations that have already been selected by SelectionBot. If these have been tagged with the WP1.0 template, these tags should be updated.
Please review articles near the top of the lists first if possible.
Miscellaneous nominations (if unsure what section to use)
Food and drink
Oups, this package of WikiProject Wine articles (selected according to the criteria for context, relevance and article quality) was originally intended to be submitted before the deadline! Sorry about that.
Wine-related articles about basic aspects of wine and wine production, to provide context for many other articles
Articles on major wine styles
Articles on wine-producing countries and regions
Articles on wine-producing regions
Language and Literature
Language & Communication
Social Sciences & Society
Technology and Engineering