|This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.|
|Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify her!|
Does it apply to dead people?
Hi Littleb2009, I discovered your Page for Vandalism Only. I’m totally going to take you up on that offer… it sounds like a lot of fun. Before I do it, I have one question— one of your rules is no personal attacks unless you have permission from the person. Does the rule apply if you’re making an attack against someone that’s been dead for over 20 years? Helen (let’s talk) 03:12, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- @HelenDegenerate: it counts for people who can't give permission, since you might anger their relatives. --littleb2009 (she/her) (talk • contribs) 19:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Super Bowl LV Reverted Edit
When you said I added an edit without citing a reliable source what do you mean? Should I have cited the Super Bowl LIV page? I edited somethings in the Bucs season page and the edits didn't get reverted so I´m confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrAgentSochi (talk • contribs)
- @MrAgentSochi: Almost everything that exists on Wikipedia has to be cited, and you should cite everything you add. You always have to prove it. Note that there is one exception, the plots of books and movies, where the assumption is that the source is the book or movie in question. --littleb2009 (she/her) (talk • contribs) 19:56, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- P.S. Sorry about your experiences with your first edits. I understand you, and yeah, my talk page had an ugly message on it once.
So what exactly do you think I should cite? Btw the t in after is missing in the "SHUT UP, IDIOT" award section. I rather tell you to avoid another "Tiger Trouble". :) - MrAgentSochi
Your reverts on Super Cub (novel series) and Those Snow White Notes
The changes were not unsourced. If you look at the episode table, the source is at the top and applies to all entries in the column, which is a common citation method for weekly release episodes. Please remember this. Link20XX (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Link20XX: Thank you, next time I will be more careful. Remember, I am human. --littleb2009 (she/her) (talk • contribs) 00:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
I did it
Hi Littleb2009. After reviewing your request, I haverollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Seddon talk 00:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Special Barnstar|
|I know you’ve stopped using this account, so you’ll probably never see this barnstar. I just wanted to thank you for having such a fabulously funny user page. Helen (let’s talk) 01:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
- Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
- An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.
- IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.
- The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.