This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2013)
In mathematics, a real coordinate space of dimension n, written Rn (// ar-EN) or , is a coordinate space over the real numbers. This means that it is the set of the n-tuples of real numbers (sequences of n real numbers). With component-wise addition and scalar multiplication, it is a real vector space.
Typically, the Cartesian coordinates of the elements of a Euclidean space form a real coordinate space. This explains the name of coordinate space and the fact that geometric terms are often used when working with coordinate spaces. For example, R2 is a plane.
Definition and structures
An element of Rn is thus a n-tuple, and is written
The real n-space has several further properties, notably:
- With componentwise addition and scalar multiplication, it is a real vector space. Every n-dimensional real vector space is isomorphic to it.
- With the dot product (sum of the term by term product of the components), it is an inner product space. Every n-dimensional real inner product space is isomorphic to it.
- As every inner product space, it is a topological space, and a topological vector space.
- It is a Euclidean space and a real affine space, and every Euclidean or affine space is isomorphic to it.
- It is an analytic manifold, and can be considered as the prototype of all manifolds, as, by definition, a manifold is, near each point, isomorphic to an open subset of Rn.
- It is an algebraic variety, and every real algebraic variety is a subset of Rn.
The domain of a function of several variables
Any function f(x1, x2, …, xn) of n real variables can be considered as a function on Rn (that is, with Rn as its domain). The use of the real n-space, instead of several variables considered separately, can simplify notation and suggest reasonable definitions. Consider, for n = 2, a function composition of the following form:
where functions g1 and g2 are continuous. If
- ∀x1 ∈ R : f(x1, ·) is continuous (by x2)
- ∀x2 ∈ R : f(·, x2) is continuous (by x1)
then F is not necessarily continuous. Continuity is a stronger condition: the continuity of f in the natural R2 topology (discussed below), also called multivariable continuity, which is sufficient for continuity of the composition F.
The coordinate space Rn forms an n-dimensional vector space over the field of real numbers with the addition of the structure of linearity, and is often still denoted Rn. The operations on Rn as a vector space are typically defined by
The zero vector is given by
and the additive inverse of the vector x is given by
This structure is important because any n-dimensional real vector space is isomorphic to the vector space Rn.
and sometimes as a row vector:
Linear transformations from Rn to Rm may then be written as m × n matrices which act on the elements of Rn via left multiplication (when the elements of Rn are column vectors) and on elements of Rm via right multiplication (when they are row vectors). The formula for left multiplication, a special case of matrix multiplication, is:
The coordinate space Rn comes with a standard basis:
To see that this is a basis, note that an arbitrary vector in Rn can be written uniquely in the form
Geometric properties and uses
The fact that real numbers, unlike many other fields, constitute an ordered field yields an orientation structure on Rn. Any full-rank linear map of Rn to itself either preserves or reverses orientation of the space depending on the sign of the determinant of its matrix. If one permutes coordinates (or, in other words, elements of the basis), the resulting orientation will depend on the parity of the permutation.
Diffeomorphisms of Rn or domains in it, by their virtue to avoid zero Jacobian, are also classified to orientation-preserving and orientation-reversing. It has important consequences for the theory of differential forms, whose applications include electrodynamics.
Another manifestation of this structure is that the point reflection in Rn has different properties depending on evenness of n. For even n it preserves orientation, while for odd n it is reversed (see also improper rotation).
Rn understood as an affine space is the same space, where Rn as a vector space acts by translations. Conversely, a vector has to be understood as a "difference between two points", usually illustrated by a directed line segment connecting two points. The distinction says that there is no canonical choice of where the origin should go in an affine n-space, because it can be translated anywhere.
In a real vector space, such as Rn, one can define a convex cone, which contains all non-negative linear combinations of its vectors. Corresponding concept in an affine space is a convex set, which allows only convex combinations (non-negative linear combinations that sum to 1).
In the language of universal algebra, a vector space is an algebra over the universal vector space R∞ of finite sequences of coefficients, corresponding to finite sums of vectors, while an affine space is an algebra over the universal affine hyperplane in this space (of finite sequences summing to 1), a cone is an algebra over the universal orthant (of finite sequences of nonnegative numbers), and a convex set is an algebra over the universal simplex (of finite sequences of nonnegative numbers summing to 1). This geometrizes the axioms in terms of "sums with (possible) restrictions on the coordinates".
Another concept from convex analysis is a convex function from Rn to real numbers, which is defined through an inequality between its value on a convex combination of points and sum of values in those points with the same coefficients.
The dot product
is defined, providing a metric space structure on Rn in addition to its affine structure.
As for vector space structure, the dot product and Euclidean distance usually are assumed to exist in Rn without special explanations. However, the real n-space and a Euclidean n-space are distinct objects, strictly speaking. Any Euclidean n-space has a coordinate system where the dot product and Euclidean distance have the form shown above, called Cartesian. But there are many Cartesian coordinate systems on a Euclidean space.
Conversely, the above formula for the Euclidean metric defines the standard Euclidean structure on Rn, but it is not the only possible one. Actually, any positive-definite quadratic form q defines its own "distance" √, but it is not very different from the Euclidean one in the sense that
Such a change of the metric preserves some of its properties, for example the property of being a complete metric space. This also implies that any full-rank linear transformation of Rn, or its affine transformation, does not magnify distances more than by some fixed C2, and does not make distances smaller than 1 ∕ C1 times, a fixed finite number times smaller.[clarification needed]
The aforementioned equivalence of metric functions remains valid if √ is replaced with M(x − y), where M is any convex positive homogeneous function of degree 1, i.e. a vector norm (see Minkowski distance for useful examples). Because of this fact that any "natural" metric on Rn is not especially different from the Euclidean metric, Rn is not always distinguished from a Euclidean n-space even in professional mathematical works.
In algebraic and differential geometry
Other structures considered on Rn include the one of a pseudo-Euclidean space, symplectic structure (even n), and contact structure (odd n). All these structures, although can be defined in a coordinate-free manner, admit standard (and reasonably simple) forms in coordinates.
Polytopes in Rn
There are three families of polytopes which have simple representations in Rn spaces, for any n, and can be used to visualize any affine coordinate system in a real n-space. Vertices of a hypercube have coordinates (x1, x2, …, xn) where each xk takes on one of only two values, typically 0 or 1. However, any two numbers can be chosen instead of 0 and 1, for example −1 and 1. An n-hypercube can be thought of as the Cartesian product of n identical intervals (such as the unit interval [0,1]) on the real line. As an n-dimensional subset it can be described with a system of 2n inequalities:
|(for [0,1])||(for [−1,1])|
Each vertex of the cross-polytope has, for some k, the xk coordinate equal to ±1 and all other coordinates equal to 0 (such that it is the kth standard basis vector up to sign). This is a dual polytope of hypercube. As an n-dimensional subset it can be described with a single inequality which uses the absolute value operation:
but this can be expressed with a system of 2n linear inequalities as well.
The third polytope with simply enumerable coordinates is the standard simplex, whose vertices are n standard basis vectors and the origin (0, 0, …, 0). As an n-dimensional subset it is described with a system of n + 1 linear inequalities:
Replacement of all "≤" with "<" gives interiors of these polytopes.
The topological structure of Rn (called standard topology, Euclidean topology, or usual topology) can be obtained not only from Cartesian product. It is also identical to the natural topology induced by Euclidean metric discussed above: a set is open in the Euclidean topology if and only if it contains an open ball around each of its points. Also, Rn is a linear topological space (see continuity of linear maps above), and there is only one possible (non-trivial) topology compatible with its linear structure. As there are many open linear maps from Rn to itself which are not isometries, there can be many Euclidean structures on Rn which correspond to the same topology. Actually, it does not depend much even on the linear structure: there are many non-linear diffeomorphisms (and other homeomorphisms) of Rn onto itself, or its parts such as a Euclidean open ball or the interior of a hypercube).
Rn has the topological dimension n. An important result on the topology of Rn, that is far from superficial, is Brouwer's invariance of domain. Any subset of Rn (with its subspace topology) that is homeomorphic to another open subset of Rn is itself open. An immediate consequence of this is that Rm is not homeomorphic to Rn if m ≠ n – an intuitively "obvious" result which is nonetheless difficult to prove.
Despite the difference in topological dimension, and contrary to a naïve perception, it is possible to map a lesser-dimensional[clarification needed] real space continuously and surjectively onto Rn. A continuous (although not smooth) space-filling curve (an image of R1) is possible.[clarification needed]
|Empty column vector,|
the only element of R0
n ≤ 1
Cases of 0 ≤ n ≤ 1 do not offer anything new: R1 is the real line, whereas R0 (the space containing the empty column vector) is a singleton, understood as a zero vector space. However, it is useful to include these as trivial cases of theories that describe different n.
n = 2
n = 3
n = 4
The first major use of R4 is a spacetime model: three spatial coordinates plus one temporal. This is usually associated with theory of relativity, although four dimensions were used for such models since Galilei. The choice of theory leads to different structure, though: in Galilean relativity the t coordinate is privileged, but in Einsteinian relativity it is not. Special relativity is set in Minkowski space. General relativity uses curved spaces, which may be thought of as R4 with a curved metric for most practical purposes. None of these structures provide a (positive-definite) metric on R4.
Euclidean R4 also attracts the attention of mathematicians, for example due to its relation to quaternions, a 4-dimensional real algebra themselves. See rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space for some information.
Norms on Rn
One could define many norms on the vector space Rn. Some common examples are
- the p-norm, defined by for all where is a positive integer. The case is very important, because it is exactly the Euclidean norm.
- the -norm or maximum norm, defined by for all Rn. This is the limit of all the p-norms: .
A really surprising and helpful result is that every norm defined on Rn is equivalent. This means for two arbitrary norms and on Rn you can always find positive real numbers , such that
for all .
This defines an equivalence relation on the set of all norms on Rn. With this result you can check that a sequence of vectors in Rn converges with if and only if it converges with .
Here is a sketch of what a proof of this result may look like:
- We show that there exists a , such that for all . In this step you use the fact that every can be represented as a linear combination of the standard basis: . Then with the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality , where .
- Now we have to find an , such that for all . Assume there is no such . Then there exists for every a , such that . Define a second sequence by . This sequence is bounded because . So because of the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem there exists a convergent subsequence with limit Rn. Now we show that but , which is a contradiction. It is , because and , so . This implies , so . On the other hand , because . This can not ever be true, so the assumption was false and there exists such a .