In mathematics, the method of characteristics is a technique for solving partial differential equations. Typically, it applies to first-order equations, although more generally the method of characteristics is valid for any hyperbolic partial differential equation. The method is to reduce a partial differential equation to a family of ordinary differential equations along which the solution can be integrated from some initial data given on a suitable hypersurface.
Characteristics of first-order partial differential equation
For a first-order PDE (partial differential equation), the method of characteristics discovers curves (called characteristic curves or just characteristics) along which the PDE becomes an ordinary differential equation (ODE). Once the ODE is found, it can be solved along the characteristic curves and transformed into a solution for the original PDE.
For the sake of simplicity, we confine our attention to the case of a function of two independent variables x and y for the moment. Consider a quasilinear PDE of the form
Suppose that a solution z is known, and consider the surface graph z = z(x,y) in R3. A normal vector to this surface is given by
is tangent to the surface z = z(x,y) at every point, for the dot product of this vector field with the above normal vector is zero. In other words, the graph of the solution must be a union of integral curves of this vector field. These integral curves are called the characteristic curves of the original partial differential equation and are given by the Lagrange–Charpit equations
A parametrization invariant form of the Lagrange–Charpit equations is:
Linear and quasilinear cases
Consider now a PDE of the form
For this PDE to be linear, the coefficients ai may be functions of the spatial variables only, and independent of u. For it to be quasilinear, ai may also depend on the value of the function, but not on any derivatives. The distinction between these two cases is inessential for the discussion here.
For a linear or quasilinear PDE, the characteristic curves are given parametrically by
such that the following system of ODEs is satisfied
Proof for quasilinear Case
In the quasilinear case, the use of the method of characteristics is justified by Grönwall's inequality. The above equation may be written as
We must distinguish between the solutions to the ODE and the solutions to the PDE, which we do not know are equal a priori. Letting capital letters be the solutions to the ODE we find
Examining , we find, upon differentiating that
We cannot conclude the above is 0 as we would like, since the PDE only guarantees us that this relationship is satisfied for , , and we do not yet know that .
However, we can see that
By the triangle inequality, we have
Assuming are at least , we can bound this for small times. Choose a neighborhood around small enough such that are locally Lipschitz. By continuity, will remain in for small enough . Since , we also have that will be in for small enough by continuity. So, and for . Additionally, for some for by compactness. From this, we find the above is bounded as
Fully nonlinear case
Consider the partial differential equation
where the variables pi are shorthand for the partial derivatives
Let (xi(s),u(s),pi(s)) be a curve in R2n+1. Suppose that u is any solution, and that
Along a solution, differentiating (4) with respect to s gives
where λ is a constant. Writing these equations more symmetrically, one obtains the Lagrange–Charpit equations for the characteristic
Geometrically, the method of characteristics in the fully nonlinear case can be interpreted as requiring that the Monge cone of the differential equation should everywhere be tangent to the graph of the solution.
As an example, consider the advection equation (this example assumes familiarity with PDE notation, and solutions to basic ODEs).
where is constant and is a function of and . We want to transform this linear first-order PDE into an ODE along the appropriate curve; i.e. something of the form
where is a characteristic line. First, we find
by the chain rule. Now, if we set and we get
which is the left hand side of the PDE we started with. Thus
So, along the characteristic line , the original PDE becomes the ODE . That is to say that along the characteristics, the solution is constant. Thus, where and lie on the same characteristic. Therefore, to determine the general solution, it is enough to find the characteristics by solving the characteristic system of ODEs:
- , letting we know ,
- , letting we know ,
- , letting we know .
In this case, the characteristic lines are straight lines with slope , and the value of remains constant along any characteristic line.
Characteristics of linear differential operators
of order k. In a local coordinate system xi,
where the ξi are the fiber coordinates on the cotangent bundle induced by the coordinate differentials dxi. Although this is defined using a particular coordinate system, the transformation law relating the ξi and the xi ensures that σP is a well-defined function on the cotangent bundle.
The function σP is homogeneous of degree k in the ξ variable. The zeros of σP, away from the zero section of T∗X, are the characteristics of P. A hypersurface of X defined by the equation F(x) = c is called a characteristic hypersurface at x if
Invariantly, a characteristic hypersurface is a hypersurface whose conormal bundle is in the characteristic set of P.
Qualitative analysis of characteristics
Characteristics are also a powerful tool for gaining qualitative insight into a PDE.
One can use the crossings of the characteristics to find shock waves for potential flow in a compressible fluid. Intuitively, we can think of each characteristic line implying a solution to along itself. Thus, when two characteristics cross, the function becomes multi-valued resulting in a non-physical solution. Physically, this contradiction is removed by the formation of a shock wave, a tangential discontinuity or a weak discontinuity and can result in non-potential flow, violating the initial assumptions.
The direction of the characteristic lines indicate the flow of values through the solution, as the example above demonstrates. This kind of knowledge is useful when solving PDEs numerically as it can indicate which finite difference scheme is best for the problem.
- Zachmanoglou, E. C.; Thoe, Dale W. (1976), "Linear Partial Differential Equations : Characteristics, Classification, and Canonical Forms", Introduction to Partial Differential Equations with Applications, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, pp. 112–152, ISBN 0-486-65251-3
- John, Fritz (1991), Partial differential equations (4th ed.), Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-90609-6
- Delgado, Manuel (1997), "The Lagrange-Charpit Method", SIAM Review, 39 (2): 298–304, Bibcode:1997SIAMR..39..298D, doi:10.1137/S0036144595293534, JSTOR 2133111
- Debnath, Lokenath (2005), "Conservation Laws and Shock Waves", Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers (2nd ed.), Boston: Birkhäuser, pp. 251–276, ISBN 0-8176-4323-0
- Courant, Richard; Hilbert, David (1962), Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume II, Wiley-Interscience
- Evans, Lawrence C. (1998), Partial Differential Equations, Providence: American Mathematical Society, ISBN 0-8218-0772-2
- Polyanin, A. D.; Zaitsev, V. F.; Moussiaux, A. (2002), Handbook of First Order Partial Differential Equations, London: Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0-415-27267-X
- Polyanin, A. D. (2002), Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, ISBN 1-58488-299-9
- Sarra, Scott (2003), "The Method of Characteristics with applications to Conservation Laws", Journal of Online Mathematics and Its Applications.
- Streeter, VL; Wylie, EB (1998), Fluid mechanics (International 9th Revised ed.), McGraw-Hill Higher Education