The relations between form a module. One is generally interested to the case where is a generating set of a finitely generated module M, in which case the module of the relations is often called a syzygy module of M. The syzygy module depends on the choice of a generating set, but it is unique up to the direct sum with a free module. That is, if and are syzygy modules corresponding to two generating sets of the same module, then there are stably isomorphic, which means that there exist two free modules and such that and are isomorphic.
Higher order syzygy modules are defined recursively: a first syzygy module of a module M is simply its syzygy module. For k > 1, a kth syzygy module of M is a syzygy module of a (k – 1)-th syzygy module. Hilbert's syzygy theorem states that, if is a polynomial ring in n indeterminates over a field, then every nth syzygy module is free. The case n = 0 is the fact that every finite dimensional vector space has a basis, and the case n = 1 is the fact that K[x] is a principal ideal domain and that every submodule of a finitely generated free K[x] module is also free.
The construction of higher order syzygy modules is generalized as the definition of free resolutions, which allows restating Hilbert's syzygy theorem as a polynomial ring in n indeterminates over a field has global homological dimension n.
If a and b are two elements of the commutative ring R, then (b, –a) is a relation that is said trivial. The module of trivial relations of an ideal is the submodule of the first syzygy module of the ideal that is generated by the trivial relations between the elements of a generating set of an ideal. The concept of trivial relations can be generalized to higher order syzygy modules, and the leads to the concept of the Koszul complex of an ideal, which provides information on the non-trivial relations between the generators of an ideal.
If is a generating set of M, the relation is often called a syzygy of M. It makes sense to call it a syzygy of without regard to because, although the syzygy module depends on the chosen generating set, most of its properties are independent; see § Stable properties, below.
If the ring R is Noetherian, or, at least coherent, and if M is finitely generated, then the syzygy module is also finitely generated. A syzygy module of this syzygy module is a second syzygy module of M. Continuing this way one can define a kth syzygy module for every positive integer k.
Generally speaking, in the language of K-theory, a property is stable if it becomes true by making a direct sum with a sufficiently large free module. A fundamental property of syzygies modules is that there are "stably independent" on choices of generating sets for involved modules. The following result is the basis of these stable properties.
Proof. As is a generating set, each can be written This provides a relation between Now, if is any relation, then is a relation between the only. In other words, every relation between is a sum of a relation between and a linear combination of the s. It is straightforward to prove that this decomposition is unique, and this proves the result.
This prove that the first syzygy module is "stably unique". More precisely, given two generating sets and of a module M, if and are the corresponding modules of relations, then there exist two free modules and such that and are isomorphic. For proving this, it suffices to apply twice the preceding proposition for getting two decompositions of the module of the relations between the union of the two generating sets.
For obtaining a similar result for higher syzygy modules, it remains to prove that, if M is any module, and L is a free module, then M and M ⊕ L have isomorphic syzygy modules. It suffices to consider a generating set of M ⊕ L that consists of a generating set of M and a basis of L. For every relation between the elements of this generating set, the coefficients of the basis elements of L are all zero, and the syzygies of M ⊕ L are exactly the syzygies of M extended with zero coefficients. This completes the proof to the following theorem.
Relationship with free resolutions
One can repeat this construction with this kernel in place of M. Repeating again and again this construction, one gets a long exact sequence
where all are free modules. By definition, such a long exact sequence is a free resolution of M.
For every k ≥ 1, the kernel of the arrow starting from is a kth syzygy module of M. It follows that the study of free resolutions is the same as the study of syzygy modules.
A free resolution is finite of length ≤ n if is free. In this case, one can take and (the zero module) for every k > n.
The global dimension of a commutative Noetherian ring is either infinite, or the minimal n such that every free resolution is finite of length at most n. A commutative Noetherian ring is regular if its global dimension is finite. In this case, the global dimension equals its Krull dimension. So, Hilbert's syzygy theorem may be restated in a very short sentence that hides much mathematics: A polynomial ring over a field is a regular ring.
In a commutative ring R, one has always ab– ba = 0. This implies trivially that (b, –a) is a linear relation between a and b. Therefore, given a generating set of an ideal I, one calls trivial relation or trivial syzygy every element of the submodule the syzygy module that is generated by these trivial relations between two generating elements. More precisely, the module of trivial syzygies is generated by the relations
such that and otherwise.
The word syzygy came into mathematics with the work of Arthur Cayley. In that paper, Cayley used it for in the theory of resultants and discriminants. As the word syzygy was used in astronomy to denote a linear relation between planets, Cayley used it to denote linear relations between minors of a matrix, such as, in the case of a 2×3 matrix:
Then, the word syzygy was popularized (among mathematicians) by David Hilbert in his 1890 article, which contains three fundamental theorems on polynomials, Hilbert's syzygy theorem, Hilbert's basis theorem and Hilbert's Nullstellensatz.
- 1847[Cayley 1847] A. Cayley, “On the theory of involution in geometry”, Cambridge Math. J. 11 (1847), 52–61. See also Collected Papers, Vol. 1 (1889), 80–94, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
- [Gel’fand et al. 1994] I. M. Gel’fand, M. M. Kapranov, and A. V. Zelevinsky, Discriminants, resultants, and multidimensional determinants, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1994.
- Serre, Jean-Pierre Algèbre locale. Multiplicités. (French) Cours au Collège de France, 1957–1958, rédigé par Pierre Gabriel. Seconde édition, 1965. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 11 Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York 1965 vii+188 pp.; this is the published form of mimeographed notes from Serre's lectures at the College de France in 1958.
- Cox, David; Little, John; O’Shea, Donal (2007). "Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms". Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. New York, NY: Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-35651-8. ISBN 978-0-387-35650-1. ISSN 0172-6056.
- Cox, David; Little, John; O’Shea, Donal (2005). "Using Algebraic Geometry". Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/b138611. ISBN 0-387-20706-6.
- Eisenbud, David (1995). Commutative Algebra with a View Toward Algebraic Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 150. Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5350-1. ISBN 0-387-94268-8.
- David Eisenbud, The Geometry of Syzygies, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 229, Springer, 2005.