**Hilbert's Nullstellensatz** (German for "theorem of zeros," or more literally, "zero-locus-theorem"—see *Satz*) is a theorem that establishes a fundamental relationship between geometry and algebra. This relationship is the basis of algebraic geometry, a branch of mathematics. It relates algebraic sets to ideals in polynomial rings over algebraically closed fields. This relationship was discovered by David Hilbert who proved the Nullstellensatz and several other important related theorems named after him (like Hilbert's basis theorem).

## Formulation

Let *k* be a field (such as the rational numbers) and *K* be an algebraically closed field extension (such as the complex numbers). Consider the polynomial ring and let *I* be an ideal in this ring. The algebraic set V(*I*) defined by this ideal consists of all *n*-tuples **x** = (*x*_{1},...,*x*_{n}) in *K ^{n}* such that

*f*(

**x**) = 0 for all

*f*in

*I*. Hilbert's Nullstellensatz states that if

*p*is some polynomial in that vanishes on the algebraic set V(

*I*), i.e.

*p*(

**x**) = 0 for all

**x**in

*V*(

*I*), then there exists a natural number

*r*such that

*p*

^{r}is in

*I*.

^{[1]}

An immediate corollary is the *weak Nullstellensatz*: The ideal contains 1 if and only if the polynomials in *I* do not have any common zeros in *K ^{n}*. It may also be formulated as follows: if

*I*is a proper ideal in then V(

*I*) cannot be empty, i.e. there exists a common zero for all the polynomials in the ideal in every algebraically closed extension of

*k*. This is the reason for the name of the theorem, which can be proved easily from the 'weak' form using the Rabinowitsch trick. The assumption of considering common zeros in an algebraically closed field is essential here; for example, the elements of the proper ideal (

*X*

^{2}+ 1) in do not have a common zero in

With the notation common in algebraic geometry, the Nullstellensatz can also be formulated as

for every ideal *J*. Here, denotes the radical of *J* and I(*U*) is the ideal of all polynomials that vanish on the set *U*.

In this way, we obtain an order-reversing bijective correspondence between the algebraic sets in *K*^{n} and the radical ideals of In fact, more generally, one has a Galois connection between subsets of the space and subsets of the algebra, where "Zariski closure" and "radical of the ideal generated" are the closure operators.

As a particular example, consider a point . Then . More generally,

Conversely, every maximal ideal of the polynomial ring (note that is algebraically closed) is of the form for some .

As another example, an algebraic subset *W* in *K*^{n} is irreducible (in the Zariski topology) if and only if is a prime ideal.

## Proof and generalization

There are many known proofs of the theorem. One proof uses Zariski's lemma, which asserts that if a field is finitely generated as an associative algebra over a field *k*, then it is a finite field extension of *k* (that is, it is also finitely generated as a vector space). Here is a sketch of this proof.^{[2]}

Let (*k* algebraically closed field), *I* an ideal of *A,* and *V* the common zeros of *I* in . Clearly, . Let . Then for some prime ideal in *A*. Let and a maximal ideal in . By Zariski's lemma, is a finite extension of *k*; thus, is *k* since *k* is algebraically closed. Let be the images of under the natural map . It follows that and .

The Nullstellensatz also follows trivially from a systematic development of Jacobson rings, in which a radical ideal is an intersection of maximal ideals. Let be a Jacobson ring. If is a finitely generated *R*-algebra, then is a Jacobson ring. Further, if is a maximal ideal, then is a maximal ideal of R, and is a finite extension field of .

Another generalization states that a faithfully flat morphism of schemes locally of finite type with *X* quasi-compact has a *quasi-section*, i.e. there exists affine and faithfully flat and quasi-finite over *X* together with an *X*-morphism

## Effective Nullstellensatz

In all of its variants, Hilbert's Nullstellensatz asserts that some polynomial g belongs or not to an ideal generated, say, by *f*_{1}, ..., *f _{k}*; we have

*g*=

*f*in the strong version,

^{ r}*g*= 1 in the weak form. This means the existence or the non-existence of polynomials

*g*

_{1}, ...,

*g*such that

_{k}*g*=

*f*

_{1}

*g*

_{1}+ ... +

*f*. The usual proofs of the Nullstellensatz are not constructive, non-effective, in the sense that they do not give any way to compute the

_{k}g_{k}*g*.

_{i}It is thus a rather natural question to ask if there is an effective way to compute the *g _{i}* (and the exponent r in the strong form) or to prove that they do not exist. To solve this problem, it suffices to provide an upper bound on the total degree of the

*g*: such a bound reduces the problem to a finite system of linear equations that may be solved by usual linear algebra techniques. Any such upper bound is called an

_{i}**effective Nullstellensatz**.

A related problem is the **ideal membership problem**, which consists in testing if a polynomial belongs to an ideal. For this problem also, a solution is provided by an upper bound on the degree of the *g _{i}*. A general solution of the ideal membership problem provides an effective Nullstellensatz, at least for the weak form.

In 1925, Grete Hermann gave an upper bound for ideal membership problem that is doubly exponential in the number of variables. In 1982 Mayr and Meyer gave an example where the *g _{i}* have a degree that is at least double exponential, showing that every general upper bound for the ideal membership problem is doubly exponential in the number of variables.

Since most mathematicians at the time assumed the effective Nullstellensatz was at least as hard as ideal membership, few mathematicians sought a bound better than double-exponential. In 1987, however, W. Dale Brownawell gave an upper bound for the effective Nullstellensatz that is simply exponential in the number of variables.^{[3]} Brownawell's proof relied on analytic techniques valid only in characteristic 0, but, one year later, János Kollár gave a purely algebraic proof, valid in any characteristic, of a slightly better bound.

In the case of the weak Nullstellensatz, Kollár's bound is the following:^{[4]}

- Let
*f*_{1}, ...,*f*be polynomials in_{s}*n*≥ 2 variables, of total degree*d*_{1}≥ ... ≥*d*. If there exist polynomials_{s}*g*such that_{i}*f*_{1}*g*_{1}+ ... +*f*= 1, then they can be chosen such that_{s}g_{s} - This bound is optimal if all the degrees are greater than 2.

If d is the maximum of the degrees of the *f _{i}*, this bound may be simplified to

Kollár's result has been improved by several authors. As of 14 October 2012^{[update]}, the best improvement, due to M. Sombra is^{[5]}

His bound improves Kollár's as soon as at least two of the degrees that are involved are lower than 3.

## Projective Nullstellensatz

We can formulate a certain correspondence between homogeneous ideals of polynomials and algebraic subsets of a projective space, called the **projective Nullstellensatz**, that is analogous to the affine one. To do that, we introduce some notations. Let The homogeneous ideal,

is called the *maximal homogeneous ideal* (see also irrelevant ideal). As in the affine case, we let: for a subset and a homogeneous ideal *I* of *R*,

By we mean: for every homogeneous coordinates of a point of *S* we have . This implies that the homogeneous components of *f* are also zero on *S* and thus that is a homogeneous ideal. Equivalently, is the homogeneous ideal generated by homogeneous polynomials *f* that vanish on *S*. Now, for any homogeneous ideal , by the usual Nullstellensatz, we have:

and so, like in the affine case, we have:^{[6]}

- There exists an order-reversing one-to-one correspondence between proper homogeneous radical ideals of
*R*and subsets of of the form The correspondence is given by and

## Analytic Nullstellensatz

The Nullstellensatz also holds for the germs of holomorphic functions at a point of complex *n*-space Precisely, for each open subset let denote the ring of holomorphic functions on *U*; then is a *sheaf* on The stalk at, say, the origin can be shown to be a Noetherian local ring that is a unique factorization domain.

If is a germ represented by a holomorphic function , then let be the equivalence class of the set

where two subsets are considered equivalent if for some neighborhood *U* of 0. Note is independent of a choice of the representative For each ideal let denote for some generators of *I*. It is well-defined; i.e., is independent of a choice of the generators.

For each subset , let

It is easy to see that is an ideal of and that if in the sense discussed above.

The **analytic Nullstellensatz** then states:^{[7]} for each ideal ,

where the left-hand side is the radical of *I*.

## See also

- Stengle's Positivstellensatz
- Differential Nullstellensatz
- Combinatorial Nullstellensatz
- Artin–Tate lemma
- Real radical
- Restricted power series#Tate algebra, an analog of Hilbert's nullstellensatz holds for Tate algebras.

## Notes

**^**Zariski–Samuel, Ch. VII, Theorem 14**^**Atiyah–MacDonald 1969, Ch. 7**^**Brownawell, W. Dale (1987), "Bounds for the degrees in the Nullstellensatz",*Ann. of Math.*,**126**(3): 577–591, doi:10.2307/1971361, MR 0916719**^**Kollár, János (1988), "Sharp Effective Nullstellensatz" (PDF),*Journal of the American Mathematical Society*,**1**(4): 963–975, doi:10.2307/1990996, MR 0944576, archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-03, retrieved 2012-10-14**^**Sombra, Martín (1999), "A Sparse Effective Nullstellensatz",*Advances in Applied Mathematics*,**22**(2): 271–295, arXiv:alg-geom/9710003, doi:10.1006/aama.1998.0633, MR 1659402**^**This formulation comes from Milne, Algebraic geometry [1] and differs from Hartshorne 1977, Ch. I, Exercise 2.4**^**Huybrechts, Proposition 1.1.29.

## References

- J. M. Almira,
*Nullstellensatz revisited*, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Pol. Torino - Vol. 65 (3) (2007) 365-369 - M. Atiyah, I.G. Macdonald,
*Introduction to Commutative Algebra*, Addison–Wesley, 1994. ISBN 0-201-40751-5 - Shigeru Mukai (2003).
*An Introduction to Invariants and Moduli*. Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics.**81**. William Oxbury (trans.). p. 82. ISBN 0-521-80906-1. - David Eisenbud,
*Commutative Algebra With a View Toward Algebraic Geometry*, New York : Springer-Verlag, 1999. - Hartshorne, Robin (1977),
*Algebraic Geometry*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics,**52**, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157 - Huybrechts, Daniel (2005).
*Complex Geometry: An Introduction*. Springer. ISBN 3-540-21290-6. - Zariski, Oscar; Samuel, Pierre (1960).
*Commutative algebra. Volume II*. Berlin. ISBN 978-3-662-27753-9.