This page is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, Please note that Ignorance, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBottalk 00:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team
Can we please provide a link or explanation for "pathè" in Ataraxia?
Ataraxia currently includes a quote from Sextus Empiricus -
We always say that as regards belief (i.e., dogma) the Pyrrhonist's goal is ataraxia,
and that as regards things that are unavoidable it is having moderate pathè.
No definition of the term "pathè" is provided, and I'm sure that it will be unfamiliar to many users.
I linked it to some existing text in Wikipedia, but another editor felt that my link was incorrect.
Can we please provide an appropriate definition, explanation, or link in Ataraxia?
Philosophy of business is pretty much a stub, but it would seem to be a very important article, considering the amount books written on the topic; and even the subcategory of Sun Tzu's Art of War in business books are very numerous. We don't have coverage, and it could do with some help. Could editors familiar with the topic expand the article? -- 126.96.36.199 (talk) 10:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Harvard philosopher Cristobal de Losada Lopez de Romana has been acclaimed for his works rebutting LNC and arguing against theories around explosion. While admitting to not fully pursuing his ideas due to cowardice and focusing on other works he characterizes as Malthusian (not in their alarmist quality but rather in the start contrast between their widespread popularity and low accuracy), he has pushed these theories farther than many others before.
Just in case there are folks here who might be interested in reviewing drafts awaiting article status that are particular to this WikiProject. If you'd like to sign up to review/approve/decline new Drafts, instructions are here. AFC Reviewers get to use really cool automated tools that make reviewing really quick and easy, and I've really enjoyed volunteering there, and I'm really digging the AFC Sorting tool so instead of having to comb through lots of articles, I can zip right to topics I'm interested in. MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)