 Archives | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Nomination for merging of Template:User lang
Template:User lang has been nominated for merging with Template:Userbox-level. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 17:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
User:Esanchez7587/Autograph book
There is a weird font appearing on this page. Could you please fix it? I'm trying to fix it myself, but I don't know what is causing that. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 03:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Fixed. – 
A tag has been placed on Category:Nunavut road transport articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop editing my talk archives
I assume you've got some sort of bot that updates the style on announcements - it has twice edited a 2014 archive of my talk page. Please stop it from doing that; archived pages are historical records not only of what was said and done but how things looked. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- @DavidWBrooks: The edit was to make it look the same as it did before. The template {{border-radius}} has now been deleted, so some of the items on your archive page will no longer have the rounded corners if you rollback that edit. -- WOSlinker (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- I see; OK. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:10, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for your efforts
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| Thank you for your continued service adding to Wikipedia throughout 2020. - Cdjp1 (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC) |
RSN / RfC: Sherdog.com Closure Mess
Hello, an uninvolved editor named Buidhe closed Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_318#RfC:_Sherdog.com some time ago with the consensus for option 2 but somehow he used the explanation for option 3 in this [1]. That caused some confusion and then some editors in favour of option 1 complained about it here at User_talk:Buidhe/Archive_12#RFC_closure. Then Buidhe changed his closure 2 weeks later in this [2], again, and disregarded votes. He gave the explanation for why he changed the closure and disregarded votes 2 weeks later here at the complaint section User_talk:Buidhe/Archive_12#RFC_closure again. Apperantly he thought 5 options were confusing for editors who voted in the RfC and other editors perhaps voted for wrong options without knowing. So he didn't come to any straightforward conclusion and in the end the closure has become a mess that didn't close anything or reflect the consensus outcome of the RfC (or anything at all for one option or the other) although it was a pretty easy and short one with a rather clear rough consensus.
It would be far better if an experienced administrator like you closed the RfC once and for all, and erase this mess the closing editor caused because it affects a lot of articles in the Wiki and cause edit wars that rely on that RfC. Thanks in advance.78.190.169.97 (talk) 14:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- See User talk:Wbm1058#RSN / RfC: Sherdog.com Closure Mess. – wbm1058 (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC)