- Talk Archive 1: April 2005 - April 2007
- Talk Archive 2: April 2007 - January 2017
- Talk Archive 2: January 2017 - January 2020
DYK nomination of Megan Rosenbloom
Hello! Your submission of Megan Rosenbloom at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Jessamyn, and welcome to Women in Red. Thanks for the interesting women's biographies you've been creating recently. I hope there will be many more. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Megan Rosenbloom--valereee (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Megan Rosenbloom
A tag has been placed on Megan Rosenbloom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the . A m i t 웃 22:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Periscopic for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Periscopic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Fayenatic London 22:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020 at Women in Red
|Women in Red|
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice
Commons - Media Search
The Structured Data team is working on an alternative, image-focused prototype for media search on Commons. The prototype uses categories, structured data as well as wikitext from Commons, and Wikidata to find its results. The development team would like your feedback on the prototype, as they are looking to work to further enhance the search experience on Commons. If you have a moment, please look over the project page set up on Commons to find a link to the prototype and leave your feedback on the talk page. Thanks for your time, I'll be posting message similar to this one to other pages on Commons. The team is looking forward to reading what you think. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Screen Shot 2020-05-30 at 18.46.57.png
Thank you for uploading File:Screen Shot 2020-05-30 at 18.46.57.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
|Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
A barnstar for you!
|Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia improving articles about women and their achievements, particularly with subjects with lesser visibility. Edit(s) like these do more than simple copy-editing – they show readers that articles about women are held to the same standards as other entries. Thank you. Donna Spencertalk-to-me⛅ 18:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)|