User talk:Altenmann

{{Eastern Slavic name}} {{Not a typo}} {{typo}}

/////////\///

Why did you undo my contribution?

You wrote: > this ix not about gafieira. also refs to youtube dance videos are not reliable and may be used only as an additional illustration

The original article (now the current) contains so much nonsense The gafieira-page also. There is a conflict with Brazilians on YouTube that Ballroom Samba is not samba. My contribution made everyhing clear: that both are the same dances, but that samba de gafieira is a fraud.

To refute my conrtribution the refuters should answer these questions first: 1 why Brazilians use the American box step as basis? 2 Why do they step on the wrong beat? 3 How can Brazilians create samba the gafieira if they can not dance the basis: the waltz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdance (talk • contribs) 11:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

I read your respons. But you reverted to the bad original article. These points are absolutely wrong: 1 It differs considerably from the original samba styles of Brazil, in particular it differs from Ballroom Samba in Brazil itself 2 ballroom samba has its origins in Samba of Brazil at the beginning of the 20th century. 3 very disconnected from the origins and evolution of the music that gives it its name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdance (talk • contribs) 21:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Third opinion requested

Hello. An editor has requested a WP:Third opinion concerning an article you have edited. You can state your opinion and take part in the discussion at Talk:Samba_de_Gafieira#Third opinion request. Sincerely,

Four tildes

Your attention is called to Wikipedia:Signatures. Your friend, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 15:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Thx, fixed. - Altenmann >talk 03:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Drost for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Drost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Drost until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Szzuk (talk) 15:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

NKVD

Can u tell me from where do u have this.--Sanandros (talk) 05:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

@Sanandros: of course not. 15 years ago, man!. But you may find much burocratic info from this encyclopedia [1]. At that time my goal was to add info to combat a ridiculous cliche widespread in the west that all what NKVD did was killing off those who did not like stalin or those whom stalin did not like. This info was readily googlable by russian terms. Most probably I got it from Memorial publications available online, because thats how i created my numerous articles about soviet political repressions. - Altenmann >talk 09:27, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

PS I suspect you dont read russian. I will fill in refs from the book I ext-linked above. - Altenmann >talk 09:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

No Russian is not my language. But the info you added is still in the article and it would be useful to kick NKVD out of the Intelligence cats (on de wp). But for that I need a reliable source.--Sanandros (talk) 12:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Did u found time to fill in the refs?--Sanandros (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry I am ill. The link to book is a ref for GUSHOSDOR. Please ask someone from WikiProject:Russia to search this book. All is there. It is encyclopedia of kgb . - Altenmann >talk 05:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Path loss

An article that you have been involved in editing—Path loss—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 14:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Natural Afrodisiac

The article Natural Afrodisiac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 14:16, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

AfD

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggravation of class struggle under socialism. Informing you because you created this page. My very best wishes (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aggravation of class struggle under socialism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Party line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help in regards to the Indian film and Hard gay. Some idiot keeps deleting my edits.144.138.236.221 (talk) 03:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Ridiculous revert

It is scarcely believable that you undid my series of clearly described and obviously necessary edits to rootless cosmopolitan with the absurd edit summary "Not an improvement as a whole". Does any of this really need explaining to you?

• as an accusation in their lack of patriotism is not grammatical; in should be of
• The expression was coined in 19th century is not grammatical; there needs to be a definite article before 19th
• the popular actor and world-famous public figure is not neutral in any context, and is transparently absurd in this case
• blogs are not reliable sources
• when and whether Golda Meir changed her surname is utterly irrelevant to this article.
• Huge enthusiastic crowds (estimated 50,000) is not grammatical; Huge is vague, and redundant when the number is given; enthusiastic is unlikely to be neutral or verifiable
• scores of Soviet Jews were fired - do you know what "scores" means?
• Many were shocked to find a Yiddish verse (sung by Mikhoels) cut out from the famous lullaby in the Soviet classic movie Circus ("Tsirk", 1936), known by heart by millions and still very popular in post-war Soviet cinemas. - many? who exactly? Who says they were shocked? Why is their claimed shock relevant? Famous is a peacock word which conveys no information. "Classic" is not neutral. "Known by heart by millions" is not verifiable. "Still very popular" is not verifiable.

And yet, you put all of these obvious failings right back in the article. What explanation do you have for doing that? 146.90.125.54 (talk) 21:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Self-irony listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self-irony. Since you had some involvement with the Self-irony redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:Sovietpd-text listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Sovietpd-text. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Sovietpd-text redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. * Pppery * _{has returned} 22:00, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Agriculture

Portal:Agriculture, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Agriculture and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Agriculture during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Legal categories of people has been nominated for discussion

Category:Legal categories of people, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Whip (dance)

A tag has been placed on Whip (dance) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 18:19, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Self-irony listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self-irony. Since you had some involvement with the Self-irony redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of lindy hop moves

The article List of lindy hop moves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unsourced list of dubious notability and almost zero content or value.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vmavanti (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schildt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wolmar Schildt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infoshops

Template:Infoshops has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mujinga (talk) 22:10, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Result of Battles of Rzhev

Hello Altenmann

Just for your information, I did not introduce the result 'tactial victory' on the article's webpage. Prior to my latest involvation, the article was heavily edited by multiple socks, (probably still going to be an issue in the near future) I simply reverted his/hers edits. It appears, that the result was inserted by an IP diff back in June 2019. I have not noticed the mistake until your edit summary. *made me chuckle* I agree with your sentiment, and I would argue —after checking my source— that the result should be 'inconclusive' per WP:IMC Template. Regards, Wildkatzen (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Russian historian Svetlana Gerasimova states in her 2013 issued book "The Rzhev Slaughterhouse: The Red Army's Forgotten 15-Month Campaign Against Army Group Center, 1942-1943" pp 167-9:

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Sandarmohk

Thanks for creating Sandarmokh. The 2018 information about "new investigations" was also covered by the Finnish national broadcaster Yle: [2] in 2018. And two days ago, Ilta-Sanomat published awo extensive articles about the effort for digging up the site again: [3][4] Interesting information that Johan Bäckman is leading the PR efforts there. In the article, Finnish historians wondered why the Russian researchers have not been interested in Finnish archives and straight suspected that it is a "propaganda stunt". I'm probably going to write something about these developments, but it's hard to write NPOV text without Russian sources. --Pudeo (talk) 18:37, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

"Stalinist era" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stalinist era. Since you had some involvement with the Stalinist era redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Geolodus (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Please give your thoughts on the LitRPG talk page

Thanks for your contributions to the LitRPG page. It was definitely helpful to have a native Russian speaker assist the page. You added a line about the trademark issue. I'm inclined to remove it, as it seems to make a point rather than it being of encyclopaedic value. But I am open minded and would value your input to the discussion at [[5]] (scroll down to trademark). Thanks. JimHolden (talk) 22:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Outhouse tipping for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outhouse tipping is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outhouse tipping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Solename

Template:Solename has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Airguard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Airguard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airguard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 16:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Computational Chemistry Grid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Computational Chemistry Grid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Computational Chemistry Grid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 20:33, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belarusian cosmonauts

A tag has been placed on Category:Belarusian cosmonauts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Luca and Loraine Baricchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luca and Loraine Baricchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca and Loraine Baricchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ツStacey (talk) 21:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Structure of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union

Category:Structure of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has been nominated for merging with Category:Organization of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 14:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

"Eastern War" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eastern War. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 6#Eastern War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. buidhe 03:35, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

DS alert

Hi, we can't engage in original research at those articles. Everything must be sourced to high-quality scholarly sources. We just follow what they say. This is to let you know that discretionary sanctions are in force for Eastern European topics, and that Żydokomuna and Jewish Bolshevism belong to that category. The following is informational only. It does not imply any wrong-doing.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SarahSV ^(talk) 19:04, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of science and engineering blunders

The article List of science and engineering blunders has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article implies that the incidents were caused by idiocy. We should avoid calling anyone an idiot.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 23:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ozon.ru for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ozon.ru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozon.ru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Melmann 17:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of fictional schools

The article List of fictional schools has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a list article which could easily run to hundreds of pages, and without being useful. An encyclopaedia isn't a search engine. This has been in CAT:NN for 4 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional schools for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional schools is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional schools (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:05, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

"Spirytus rektyfikowany" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Spirytus rektyfikowany. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 24#Spirytus rektyfikowany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Scientific institutions has been nominated for merging

Category:Scientific institutions has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 23:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Aertex

Sir, I have added the missing citations on the subject article. Kindly see and comment. Thanks and regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of E*ECAD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article E*ECAD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E*ECAD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StarM 15:58, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ideological repression

The article Ideological repression has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

censorship, authoritanism, etc... already cover

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EPIC STYLE ^{(LET'S TALK)} 07:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Electronic engineering publications

A tag has been placed on Category:Electronic engineering publications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:38, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:World War II books has been nominated for renaming

Category:World War II books has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)