|United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association|
|Argued December 8–9, 1896|
Decided March 22, 1897
|Full case name||United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association|
|Citations||166 U.S. 290 (more)|
|Majority||Peckham, joined by Fuller, Harlan, Brewer, Brown|
|Dissent||White, joined by Field, Gray, Shiras|
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was an antitrust measure that prohibited anticompetitive behavior in commerce) applied to the railroad industry, even though the U.S. Congress had enacted a comprehensive regime of regulations for that industry.
Various railroad companies had formed an organization to regulate prices charged for transportation. The federal government charged these companies with violating the Sherman Act, and the railroad companies replied that they were not in violation of the act because their organization was designed to keep prices low, not to push them higher. The companies also contended that Congress had not intended the Sherman Act to apply to them, because there were already a wide array of laws governing the railroads.
Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court held that the Sherman Act prohibited all such combinations, irrespective of the purpose. The railroad association was price fixing under the per se approach. Competition should determine the reasonable rate, not agreements between companies.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (April 2013)
- Works related to United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association at Wikisource
- ^ Text of United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897) is available from: Justia Library of Congress
|This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|