Template talk:B-Class

Template:B-Class is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should be proposed here first. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here.

Colour tweak

{{editprotected}} I wish to propose tweaking the background colour from #c8fb7b to #b2ff66. The reason is that then the B-Class colour would be mid-way between GA-Class (#66ff66) and C-Class (#ffff66). The revised colour is also of greater saturation, making more distinctive. The table below provides a comparison.

Current	GA-Class	B-Class	C-Class
Revised	GA-Class	B-Class	C-Class

Tompw (talk) (review) 10:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

I can barely tell the difference, so I don't give a damn either way. Happy‑melon 10:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Done Seems pretty uncontroversial. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you :-) Tompw (talk) (review) 20:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

well written

According to the WP:MOS#Hyphens, the expression well written should be hyphenated. I agree 100%. The B-class [more detailed criteria] incorrectly uses well written. Written is a past participle; well an adverb. The correct expression should be well-written. I propose this correction. ThsQ (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Done Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 21:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Good show, mate. ThsQ (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Icon

{{editprotected}} After the recent addition to {{A-Class}}, I was wondering if File:Symbol b class.svg could be added to this template. Thanks! -Drilnoth (talk) 00:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Please provide the code you would like to have changed. Sandstein 14:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay.

{{editprotected}} I think that this will work:

<noinclude>
{|
! </noinclude>class="assess-B {{{class|}}}" style="background: #c2ff66; text-align: center; {{{style|}}}" | [[File:Symbol b class.svg|B-Class article|14px]] '''{{#if:{{{category|}}}|[[:{{{category}}}|B]]|[[:Category:B-Class articles|B]]}}'''<noinclude>
|}
{{pp-template|small=yes}}
{{Documentation|Template:Grading scheme/doc/class}}
</noinclude>

-Drilnoth (talk) 14:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm just curious, was there a discussion to make a change that affects so many pages? §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Not which I am aware of; I brought this up mainly because of the recent edit to {{A-Class}} and thought that a similar change here would make sense, too. -Drilnoth (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

I object until this is discussed more thoroughly (see Template talk:Grading scheme#Adding images). Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 07:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I also oppose this change. I can kind of see the point of doing this with A-Class (though I don't necessarily agree with it), but adding icons to the other classes is complete overkill. PC78 (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Ah, that makes sense. Nevermind, then. -Drilnoth (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I've went ahead and nulled this as there appears to be no consensus for the change. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)