Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions
, 3 years ago
→User:Asterixf2 and Malleus Maleficarum: "My God! There are DOZENS of them!!"
(→User:Asterixf2 and Malleus Maleficarum: "My God! There are DOZENS of them!!")
'''Comment''' Asterixf2 is also rather fond of making unfounded sockpuppet accusations. As one can see in [https:/wiki/User_talk:GBRV#November_2016 this] thread. I'm not sure I have clean hands here but something has to happen. Asterixf2 simply refuses to engage in collobrative editing. He doesn't respond to comments on his proposals and is somewhat fond of bizzare [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Malleus_Maleficarum&diff=749747337&oldid=749747127 warnings], that then somehow give them justification to ignore everyone else. We have not resolved anything. They only thing we have agreed on is that I will not remove his bizzare rants and screeds anymore because it is making the talk page near impossible to parse. They will also respond to 7-10 year old posts and call them an "active conversation" [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Malleus_Maleficarum&diff=749489680&oldid=749481062 diff]. This is on top of the near constant refactoring of their own comments. They will change their comments as many as 7 times after they have posted something live. I could provide diffs but a cursory look at their contributions will bare that out. --[[User:Adamfinmo|Adam in MO]]<small> [[User talk:Adamfinmo|Talk]]</small> 23:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
* '''Reply to Comment'''
*# '''sockpuppet''' I'd like to clarify that there is no accusation of sockpuppetry. Using multiple accounts is allowed in WP and I simply asked for a simple answer which was refused. Sockpuppetry relates only to inappropriate use of multiple accounts and I have not made such an accusation.