This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |

In Information theory, **redundancy** measures the fractional difference between the entropy H(X) of an ensemble X, and its maximum possible value .^{[1]}^{[2]} Informally, it is the amount of wasted "space" used to transmit certain data. Data compression is a way to reduce or eliminate unwanted redundancy, while checksums are a way of adding desired redundancy for purposes of error detection when communicating over a noisy channel of limited capacity.

## Quantitative definition

In describing the redundancy of raw data, the **rate** of a source of information is the average entropy per symbol. For memoryless sources, this is merely the entropy of each symbol, while, in the most general case of a stochastic process, it is

the limit, as *n* goes to infinity, of the joint entropy of the first *n* symbols divided by *n*. It is common in information theory to speak of the "rate" or "entropy" of a language. This is appropriate, for example, when the source of information is English prose. The rate of a memoryless source is simply , since by definition there is no interdependence of the successive messages of a memoryless source.^{[citation needed]}

The **absolute rate** of a language or source is simply

the logarithm of the cardinality of the message space, or alphabet. (This formula is sometimes called the Hartley function.) This is the maximum possible rate of information that can be transmitted with that alphabet. (The logarithm should be taken to a base appropriate for the unit of measurement in use.) The absolute rate is equal to the actual rate if the source is memoryless and has a uniform distribution.

The **absolute redundancy** can then be defined as

the difference between the absolute rate and the rate.

The quantity is called the **relative redundancy** and gives the maximum possible data compression ratio, when expressed as the percentage by which a file size can be decreased. (When expressed as a ratio of original file size to compressed file size, the quantity gives the maximum compression ratio that can be achieved.) Complementary to the concept of relative redundancy is **efficiency**, defined as so that . A memoryless source with a uniform distribution has zero redundancy (and thus 100% efficiency), and cannot be compressed.

## Other notions

A measure of *redundancy* between two variables is the mutual information or a normalized variant. A measure of redundancy among many variables is given by the total correlation.

Redundancy of compressed data refers to the difference between the expected compressed data length of messages (or expected data rate ) and the entropy (or entropy rate ). (Here we assume the data is ergodic and stationary, e.g., a memoryless source.) Although the rate difference can be arbitrarily small as increased, the actual difference , cannot, although it can be theoretically upper-bounded by 1 in the case of finite-entropy memoryless sources.

## See also

- Minimum redundancy coding
- Data compression
- Hartley function
- Negentropy
- Source coding theorem
- Overcompleteness

## References

**^**Here it is assumed are the sets on which the probability distributions are defined.**^**MacKay, David J.C. (2003). "2.4 Definition of entropy and related functions".*Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms*. Cambridge University Press. p. 33. ISBN 0-521-64298-1.The

*redundancy*measures the fractional difference between H(X) and its maximum possible value,

- Reza, Fazlollah M. (1994) [1961].
*An Introduction to Information Theory*. New York: Dover [McGraw-Hill]. ISBN 0-486-68210-2. - Schneier, Bruce (1996).
*Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C*. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-12845-7. - Auffarth, B; Lopez-Sanchez, M.; Cerquides, J. (2010). "Comparison of Redundancy and Relevance Measures for Feature Selection in Tissue Classification of CT images".
*Advances in Data Mining. Applications and Theoretical Aspects*. Springer. pp. 248–262. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.170.1528.