|Initial release||May 27, 2007|
|Type||Classic version: CAPTCHA |
New version: checkbox
The original iteration of the service was a mass collaboration platform designed for the digitization of books, particularly those that were too illegible to be scanned by computers. The verification prompts utilized pairs of words from scanned pages, with one known word used as a control for verification, and the second used to crowdsource the reading of an uncertain word. reCAPTCHA was originally developed by Luis von Ahn, David Abraham, Manuel Blum, Michael Crawford, Ben Maurer, Colin McMillen, and Edison Tan at Carnegie Mellon University's main Pittsburgh campus. It was acquired by Google in September 2009. The system helped to digitize the archives of The New York Times, and was subsequently used by Google Books for similar purposes.
The system was reported as displaying over 100 million CAPTCHAs every day, on sites such as Facebook, TicketMaster, Twitter, 4chan, CNN.com, StumbleUpon, Craigslist (since June 2008), and the U.S. National Telecommunications and Information Administration's digital TV converter box coupon program website (as part of the US DTV transition).
In 2014, Google pivoted the service away from its original concept, with a focus on reducing the amount of user interaction needed to verify a user, and only presenting human recognition challenges (such as identifying images in a set that satisfy a specific prompt) if behavioral analysis suspects that the user may be a bot. reCAPTCHA v1 was declared end-of-life on March 31, 2018.
Distributed Proofreaders was the first project to volunteer its time to decipher scanned text that could not be read by optical character recognition (OCR) programs. It works with Project Gutenberg to digitize public domain material and uses methods quite different from reCAPTCHA.
The reCAPTCHA program originated with Guatemalan computer scientist Luis von Ahn, and was aided by a MacArthur Fellowship. An early CAPTCHA developer, he realized "he had unwittingly created a system that was frittering away, in ten-second increments, millions of hours of a most precious resource: human brain cycles".
Scanned text is subjected to analysis by two different OCRs. Any word that is deciphered differently by the two OCR programs or that is not in an English dictionary is marked as "suspicious" and converted into a CAPTCHA. The suspicious word is displayed, out of context, sometimes along with a control word already known. If the human types the control word correctly, then the response to the questionable word is accepted as probably valid. If enough users were to correctly type the control word, but incorrectly type the second word which OCR had failed to recognize, then the digital version of documents could end up containing the incorrect word. The identification performed by each OCR program is given a value of 0.5 points, and each interpretation by a human is given a full point. Once a given identification hits 2.5 points, the word is considered valid. Those words that are consistently given a single identity by human judges are later recycled as control words. If the first three guesses match each other but do not match either of the OCRs, they are considered a correct answer, and the word becomes a control word. When six users reject a word before any correct spelling is chosen, the word is discarded as unreadable.
The original reCAPTCHA method was designed to show the questionable words separately, as out-of-context correction, rather than in use, such as within a phrase of five words from the original document. Also, the control word might mislead context for the second word, such as a request of "/metal/ /fife/" being entered as "metal file" due to the logical connection of filing with a metal tool being considered more common than the musical instrument "fife".
No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA
In 2013, reCAPTCHA began implementing behavioral analysis of the browser's interactions to predict whether the user was a human or a bot. The following year, Google began to deploy a new reCAPTCHA API, featuring the "no CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA" — where users deemed to be of low risk only need to click a single checkbox to verify their identity. A CAPTCHA may still be presented if the system is uncertain of the user's risk; Google also introduced a new type of CAPTCHA challenge designed to be more accessible to mobile users, where the user must select images matching a specific prompt from a grid.
In 2017, Google introduced a new "invisible" reCAPTCHA, where verification occurs in the background, and no challenges are displayed at all if the user is deemed to be of low risk. According to former Google "click fraud czar" Shuman Ghosemajumder, this capability "creates a new sort of challenge that very advanced bots can still get around, but introduces a lot less friction to the legitimate human."
reCAPTCHA v1 was declared end-of-life and shut down on March 31, 2018.
The main purpose of a CAPTCHA system is to block spambots while allowing human users. On December 14, 2009, Jonathan Wilkins released a paper describing weaknesses in reCAPTCHA that allowed bots to achieve a solve rate of 18%.
On August 1, 2010, Chad Houck gave a presentation to the DEF CON 18 Hacking Conference detailing a method to reverse the distortion added to images which allowed a computer program to determine a valid response 10% of the time. The reCAPTCHA system was modified on July 21, 2010, before Houck was to speak on his method. Houck modified his method to what he described as an "easier" CAPTCHA to determine a valid response 31.8% of the time. Houck also mentioned security defenses in the system, including a high-security lockout if an invalid response is given 32 times in a row.
On May 26, 2012, Adam, C-P and Jeffball of DC949 gave a presentation at the LayerOne hacker conference detailing how they were able to achieve an automated solution with an accuracy rate of 99.1%. Their tactic was to use techniques from machine learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence, to analyse the audio version of reCAPTCHA which is available for the visually impaired. Google released a new version of reCAPTCHA just hours before their talk, making major changes to both the audio and visual versions of their service. In this release, the audio version was increased in length from 8 seconds to 30 seconds, and is much more difficult to understand, both for humans as well as bots. In response to this update and the following one, the members of DC949 released two more versions of Stiltwalker which beat reCAPTCHA with an accuracy of 60.95% and 59.4% respectively. After each successive break, Google updated reCAPTCHA within a few days. According to DC949, they often reverted to features that had been previously hacked.
On June 27, 2012, Claudia Cruz, Fernando Uceda, and Leobardo Reyes published a paper showing a system running on reCAPTCHA images with an accuracy of 82%. The authors have not said if their system can solve recent reCAPTCHA images, although they claim their work to be intelligent OCR and robust to some, if not all changes in the image database.
In an August 2012 presentation given at BsidesLV 2012, DC949 called the latest version "unfathomably impossible for humans" – they were not able to solve them manually either. The web accessibility organization WebAIM reported in May 2012, "Over 90% of respondents [screen reader users] find CAPTCHA to be very or somewhat difficult."
Some people were concerned when Google announced reCAPTCHA v3.0 about their privacy because of the vulnerability that people viewing the sites with reCAPTCHA v2.0 faced with the possibility of Google tracking them throughout the website as they now would have full control.
reCAPTCHA had also created project Mailhide, which protects email addresses on web pages from being harvested by spammers. By default, the email address was converted into a format that did not allow a crawler to see the full email address; for example, "email@example.com" would have been converted to "mai...@example.com". The visitor would then click on the "..." and solve the CAPTCHA in order to obtain the full email address. One could also edit the pop-up code so that none of the address was visible. Mailhide has been discontinued in 2018 because it relied on reCAPTCHA V1.
In response to the difficulty for users with disabilities and regular users alike, automated solvers such as Buster have been created, which solve the reCAPTCHA for the user, without them having to complete a challenge. Buster uses the audio part of reCAPTCHA and solves that instead of selecting visual elements, and can be installed as a browser add-on.
- Ahn, Luis von, Massive-scale online collaboration, retrieved April 14, 2020
- "reCAPTCHA: About Us". Archived from the original on June 11, 2010. Retrieved August 14, 2018.
- "Teaching computers to read: Google acquires reCAPTCHA". Retrieved September 16, 2009.
- "Deciphering Old Texts, One Woozy, Curvy Word at a Time". The New York Times. March 28, 2011. Retrieved November 20, 2017.
- "reCAPTCHA FAQ". Retrieved June 12, 2011.
- Rubens, Paul (October 2, 2007). "Spam weapon helps preserve books". BBC.
- "Fight Spam, Digitize Books". Craigslist Blog. June 2008.
- "TV Converter Box Program". dtv2009.gov. Archived from the original on November 4, 2009.
- ""Full Interview: Luis von Ahn on Duolingo", Spark, November 2011". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. November 30, 2011. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- Hutchinson, Alex (March 2009). "Human Resources: The job you didn't even know you had". The Walrus. pp. 15–16.
- Hutchinson, Alex (March 12, 2009). "Human Resources: The job you didn't even know you had". The Walrus. Retrieved December 7, 2015.
- "reCAPTCHA: Using Captchas To Digitize Books". TechCrunch. September 16, 2007.
- Timmer, John (August 14, 2008). "CAPTCHAs work? for digitizing old, damaged texts, manuscripts". Ars Technica. Retrieved December 9, 2008.
- Luis; Maurer, Ben; McMillen, Colin; Abraham, David; Blum, Manuel (2008). "reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures" (PDF)". Science. 321 (5895): 1465–1468. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.141.6563. doi:10.1126/science.1160379. PMID 18703711.
- ""questionable validity of results if words are presented out of context", Google Groups, August 29, 2008". Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- Perez, Sarah (March 29, 2012). "Google Now Using ReCAPTCHA To Decode Street View Addresses". TechCrunch. Retrieved July 10, 2013.
- "Are you a robot? Introducing "No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA"". Google Security Blog. December 3, 2014. Retrieved April 14, 2015.
- Greenberg, Andy (December 3, 2014). "Google Can Now Tell You're Not a Robot with Just One Click". Wired. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
- Schwab, Katharine (June 27, 2019). "Google's new reCAPTCHA has a dark side". Fast Company. Retrieved April 8, 2020.
- Amadeo, Ron (March 9, 2017). "Google's reCAPTCHA turns "invisible," will separate bots from people without challenges". Ars Technica. Retrieved April 14, 2020.
- "Google just made the internet a tiny bit less annoying". Popular Science. March 10, 2017. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
- "Google reCAPTCHA v1 API Shutting Down in March 2018". ProgrammableWeb. Retrieved April 14, 2020.
- "FAQ". reCAPTCHA.net. Archived from the original on July 16, 2012.
- "reCAPTCHA: Stop Spam, Read Books". Retrieved January 14, 2014.
- "Developer's Guide – reCAPTCHA — Google Developers". Retrieved January 14, 2014.
- Greenberg, Andy (June 18, 2010). "Those Scrambled Word Tests For Stopping Spambots Are Tough For Humans Too". Forbes.
- "Strong CAPTCHA Guidelines" (PDF).
- "Google's reCAPTCHA busted by new attack".
- "Google's reCAPTCHA dented".
- "Def Con 18 Speakers". defcon.org.
- "Decoding reCAPTCHA Paper". Chad Houck. Archived from the original on August 19, 2010.
- "Decoding reCAPTCHA Power Point". Chad Houck. Archived from the original on October 24, 2010.
- "Project Stiltwalker".
- Claudia Cruz-Perez; Oleg Starostenko; Fernando Uceda-Ponga; Vicente Alarcon-Aquino; Leobardo Reyes-Cabrera (June 30, 2012). "Breaking reCAPTCHAs with Unpredictable Collapse: Heuristic Character Segmentation and Recognition". In Carrasco-Ochoa, Jesús Ariel; Martínez-Trinidad, José Francisco; Olvera López, José Arturo; Boyer, Kim L (eds.). Pattern Recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 7329. México. pp. 155–165. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31149-9_16. ISBN 978-3-642-31148-2.
- "Screen Reader User Survey #4 Results".
- Harris, David L. (January 23, 2015). "Massachusetts woman's lawsuit accuses Google of using free labor to transcribe books, newspapers". Boston Business Journal.
- "Mailhide: Free Spam Protection".
- "Mailhide: Service discontinued".
- Dzieza, Josh (February 1, 2019). "Why CAPTCHAs have gotten so difficult". The Verge.
- Schwab, Katharine (June 27, 2019). "Google's new reCAPTCHA has a dark side". Fast Company.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to ReCAPTCHA.|
- Official website
- ReCAPTCHA: The job you didn't even know you had Two-page article in The Walrus magazine
- Luis; Maurer, Benjamin; McMillen, Colin; Abraham, David; Blum, Manuel (2008). "reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures". Science. 321 (5895): 1465–1468. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.141.6563. doi:10.1126/science.1160379. PMID 18703711.
- Massive-scale online collaboration, a TED talk by Luis von Ahn