In mathematics, the **Fibonacci numbers**, commonly denoted *F _{n}*, form a sequence, called the

**Fibonacci sequence**, such that each number is the sum of the two preceding ones, starting from 0 and 1. That is,

^{[1]}

and

for *n* > 1.

The beginning of the sequence is thus:

^{[2]}

In some older books, the value is omitted, so that the sequence starts with and the recurrence is valid for *n* > 2.^{[3]}^{[4]}

Fibonacci numbers are strongly related to the golden ratio: Binet's formula expresses the nth Fibonacci number in terms of n and the golden ratio, and implies that the ratio of two consecutive Fibonacci numbers tends to the golden ratio as n increases.

Fibonacci numbers are named after Italian mathematician Leonardo of Pisa, later known as Fibonacci. In his 1202 book *Liber Abaci*, Fibonacci introduced the sequence to Western European mathematics,^{[5]} although the sequence had been described earlier in Indian mathematics,^{[6]}^{[7]}^{[8]} as early as 200 BC in work by Pingala on enumerating possible patterns of Sanskrit poetry formed from syllables of two lengths.

Fibonacci numbers appear unexpectedly often in mathematics, so much so that there is an entire journal dedicated to their study, the *Fibonacci Quarterly*. Applications of Fibonacci numbers include computer algorithms such as the Fibonacci search technique and the Fibonacci heap data structure, and graphs called Fibonacci cubes used for interconnecting parallel and distributed systems.

They also appear in biological settings, such as branching in trees, the arrangement of leaves on a stem, the fruit sprouts of a pineapple, the flowering of an artichoke, an uncurling fern, and the arrangement of a pine cone's bracts.

Fibonacci numbers are also closely related to Lucas numbers , in that the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers form a complementary pair of Lucas sequences: and .

## History

The Fibonacci sequence appears in Indian mathematics in connection with Sanskrit prosody, as pointed out by Parmanand Singh in 1986.^{[7]}^{[9]}^{[10]} In the Sanskrit poetic tradition, there was interest in enumerating all patterns of long (L) syllables of 2 units duration, juxtaposed with short (S) syllables of 1 unit duration. Counting the different patterns of successive L and S with a given total duration results in the Fibonacci numbers: the number of patterns of duration *m* units is *F*_{m + 1}.^{[8]}

Knowledge of the Fibonacci sequence was expressed as early as Pingala (c. 450 BC–200 BC). Singh cites Pingala's cryptic formula *misrau cha* ("the two are mixed") and scholars who interpret it in context as saying that the number of patterns for *m* beats (*F*_{m+1}) is obtained by adding one [S] to the *F*_{m} cases and one [L] to the *F*_{m−1} cases.^{[11]}Bharata Muni also expresses knowledge of the sequence in the *Natya Shastra* (c. 100 BC–c. 350 AD).^{[12]}^{[6]}
However, the clearest exposition of the sequence arises in the work of Virahanka (c. 700 AD), whose own work is lost, but is available in a quotation by Gopala (c. 1135):^{[10]}

Variations of two earlier meters [is the variation]... For example, for [a meter of length] four, variations of meters of two [and] three being mixed, five happens. [works out examples 8, 13, 21]... In this way, the process should be followed in all

mātrā-vṛttas[prosodic combinations].^{[a]}

Hemachandra (c. 1150) is credited with knowledge of the sequence as well,^{[6]} writing that "the sum of the last and the one before the last is the number ... of the next mātrā-vṛtta."^{[14]}^{[15]}

Outside India, the Fibonacci sequence first appears in the book *Liber Abaci* (1202) by Fibonacci^{[5]}^{[16]} where it is used to calculate the growth of rabbit populations.^{[17]}^{[18]} Fibonacci considers the growth of an idealized (biologically unrealistic) rabbit population, assuming that: a newly born breeding pair of rabbits are put in a field; each breeding pair mates at the age of one month, and at the end of their second month they always produce another pair of rabbits; and rabbits never die, but continue breeding forever. Fibonacci posed the puzzle: how many pairs will there be in one year?

- At the end of the first month, they mate, but there is still only 1 pair.
- At the end of the second month they produce a new pair, so there are 2 pairs in the field.
- At the end of the third month, the original pair produce a second pair, but the second pair only mate without breeding, so there are 3 pairs in all.
- At the end of the fourth month, the original pair has produced yet another new pair, and the pair born two months ago also produces their first pair, making 5 pairs.

At the end of the *n*th month, the number of pairs of rabbits is equal to the number of mature pairs (that is, the number of pairs in month *n* – 2) plus the number of pairs alive last month (month *n* – 1). The number in the *n*th month is the *n*th Fibonacci number.^{[19]}

The name "Fibonacci sequence" was first used by the 19th-century number theorist Édouard Lucas.^{[20]}

## Applications

- The Fibonacci numbers are important in the computational run-time analysis of Euclid's algorithm to determine the greatest common divisor of two integers: the worst case input for this algorithm is a pair of consecutive Fibonacci numbers.
^{[21]} - Brasch et al. 2012 show how a generalised Fibonacci sequence also can be connected to the field of economics.
^{[22]}In particular, it is shown how a generalised Fibonacci sequence enters the control function of finite-horizon dynamic optimisation problems with one state and one control variable. The procedure is illustrated in an example often referred to as the Brock–Mirman economic growth model. - Yuri Matiyasevich was able to show that the Fibonacci numbers can be defined by a Diophantine equation, which led to his solving Hilbert's tenth problem.
^{[23]} - The Fibonacci numbers are also an example of a complete sequence. This means that every positive integer can be written as a sum of Fibonacci numbers, where any one number is used once at most.
- Moreover, every positive integer can be written in a unique way as the sum of
*one or more*distinct Fibonacci numbers in such a way that the sum does not include any two consecutive Fibonacci numbers. This is known as Zeckendorf's theorem, and a sum of Fibonacci numbers that satisfies these conditions is called a Zeckendorf representation. The Zeckendorf representation of a number can be used to derive its Fibonacci coding. - Fibonacci numbers are used by some pseudorandom number generators.
- They are also used in planning poker, which is a step in estimating in software development projects that use the Scrum methodology.
- Fibonacci numbers are used in a polyphase version of the merge sort algorithm in which an unsorted list is divided into two lists whose lengths correspond to sequential Fibonacci numbers – by dividing the list so that the two parts have lengths in the approximate proportion
*φ*. A tape-drive implementation of the polyphase merge sort was described in*The Art of Computer Programming*. - Fibonacci numbers arise in the analysis of the Fibonacci heap data structure.
- The Fibonacci cube is an undirected graph with a Fibonacci number of nodes that has been proposed as a network topology for parallel computing.
- A one-dimensional optimization method, called the Fibonacci search technique, uses Fibonacci numbers.
^{[24]} - The Fibonacci number series is used for optional lossy compression in the IFF 8SVX audio file format used on Amiga computers. The number series compands the original audio wave similar to logarithmic methods such as μ-law.
^{[25]}^{[26]} - Since the conversion factor 1.609344 for miles to kilometers is close to the golden ratio, the decomposition of distance in miles into a sum of Fibonacci numbers becomes nearly the kilometer sum when the Fibonacci numbers are replaced by their successors. This method amounts to a radix 2 number register in golden ratio base
*φ*being shifted. To convert from kilometers to miles, shift the register down the Fibonacci sequence instead.^{[27]} - In optics, when a beam of light shines at an angle through two stacked transparent plates of different materials of different refractive indexes, it may reflect off three surfaces: the top, middle, and bottom surfaces of the two plates. The number of different beam paths that have k reflections, for
*k*> 1, is the th Fibonacci number. (However, when*k*= 1, there are three reflection paths, not two, one for each of the three surfaces.)^{[28]} - Mario Merz included the Fibonacci sequence in some of his works beginning in 1970.
^{[29]} - Fibonacci retracement levels are widely used in technical analysis for financial market trading.
- Fibonacci numbers appear in the ring lemma, used to prove connections between the circle packing theorem and conformal maps.
^{[30]}

### Music

Joseph Schillinger (1895–1943) developed a system of composition which uses Fibonacci intervals in some of its melodies; he viewed these as the musical counterpart to the elaborate harmony evident within nature.^{[31]}

### Nature

Fibonacci sequences appear in biological settings,^{[32]} such as branching in trees, arrangement of leaves on a stem, the fruitlets of a pineapple,^{[33]} the flowering of artichoke, an uncurling fern and the arrangement of a pine cone,^{[34]} and the family tree of honeybees.^{[35]}^{[36]} Kepler pointed out the presence of the Fibonacci sequence in nature, using it to explain the (golden ratio-related) pentagonal form of some flowers.^{[37]} Field daisies most often have petals in counts of Fibonacci numbers.^{[38]} In 1754, Charles Bonnet discovered that the spiral phyllotaxis of plants were frequently expressed in Fibonacci number series.^{[39]}

Przemysław Prusinkiewicz advanced the idea that real instances can in part be understood as the expression of certain algebraic constraints on free groups, specifically as certain Lindenmayer grammars.^{[40]}

A model for the pattern of florets in the head of a sunflower was proposed by Helmut Vogel in 1979.^{[41]} This has the form

where *n* is the index number of the floret and *c* is a constant scaling factor; the florets thus lie on Fermat's spiral. The divergence angle, approximately 137.51°, is the golden angle, dividing the circle in the golden ratio. Because this ratio is irrational, no floret has a neighbor at exactly the same angle from the center, so the florets pack efficiently. Because the rational approximations to the golden ratio are of the form *F*(*j*):*F*(*j* + 1), the nearest neighbors of floret number *n* are those at *n* ± *F*(*j*) for some index *j*, which depends on *r*, the distance from the center. Sunflowers and similar flowers most commonly have spirals of florets in clockwise and counter-clockwise directions in the amount of adjacent Fibonacci numbers,^{[42]} typically counted by the outermost range of radii.^{[43]}

Fibonacci numbers also appear in the pedigrees of idealized honeybees, according to the following rules:

- If an egg is laid by an unmated female, it hatches a male or drone bee.
- If, however, an egg was fertilized by a male, it hatches a female.

Thus, a male bee always has one parent, and a female bee has two. If one traces the pedigree of any male bee (1 bee), he has 1 parent (1 bee), 2 grandparents, 3 great-grandparents, 5 great-great-grandparents, and so on. This sequence of numbers of parents is the Fibonacci sequence. The number of ancestors at each level, *F*_{n}, is the number of female ancestors, which is *F*_{n−1}, plus the number of male ancestors, which is *F*_{n−2}.^{[44]} This is under the unrealistic assumption that the ancestors at each level are otherwise unrelated.

It has been noticed that the number of possible ancestors on the human X chromosome inheritance line at a given ancestral generation also follows the Fibonacci sequence.^{[45]} A male individual has an X chromosome, which he received from his mother, and a Y chromosome, which he received from his father. The male counts as the "origin" of his own X chromosome (), and at his parents' generation, his X chromosome came from a single parent (). The male's mother received one X chromosome from her mother (the son's maternal grandmother), and one from her father (the son's maternal grandfather), so two grandparents contributed to the male descendant's X chromosome (). The maternal grandfather received his X chromosome from his mother, and the maternal grandmother received X chromosomes from both of her parents, so three great-grandparents contributed to the male descendant's X chromosome (). Five great-great-grandparents contributed to the male descendant's X chromosome (), etc. (This assumes that all ancestors of a given descendant are independent, but if any genealogy is traced far enough back in time, ancestors begin to appear on multiple lines of the genealogy, until eventually a population founder appears on all lines of the genealogy.)

The pathways of tubulins on intracellular microtubules arrange in patterns of 3, 5, 8 and 13.^{[46]}

## Mathematics

The Fibonacci numbers occur in the sums of "shallow" diagonals in Pascal's triangle (see binomial coefficient):^{[47]}

These numbers also give the solution to certain enumerative problems,^{[48]} the most common of which is that of counting the number of ways of writing a given number *n* as an ordered sum of 1s and 2s (called compositions); there are *F*_{n+1} ways to do this. For example, if *n* = 5, then *F*_{n+1} = *F*_{6} = 8 counts the eight compositions summing to 5:

- 5 = 1+1+1+1+1 = 1+1+1+2 = 1+1+2+1 = 1+2+1+1 = 2+1+1+1 = 2+2+1 = 2+1+2 = 1+2+2.

The Fibonacci numbers can be found in different ways among the set of binary strings, or equivalently, among the subsets of a given set.

- The number of binary strings of length
*n*without consecutive 1s is the Fibonacci number*F*_{n+2}. For example, out of the 16 binary strings of length 4, there are*F*_{6}= 8 without consecutive 1s – they are 0000, 0001, 0010, 0100, 0101, 1000, 1001, and 1010. Equivalently,*F*_{n+2}is the number of subsets*S*of {1, ...,*n*} without consecutive integers, that is, those*S*for which {*i*,*i*+ 1} ⊈*S*for every*i*. - The number of binary strings of length
*n*without an odd number of consecutive 1s is the Fibonacci number*F*_{n+1}. For example, out of the 16 binary strings of length 4, there are*F*_{5}= 5 without an odd number of consecutive 1s – they are 0000, 0011, 0110, 1100, 1111. Equivalently, the number of subsets*S*of {1, ...,*n*} without an odd number of consecutive integers is*F*_{n+1}. - The number of binary strings of length
*n*without an even number of consecutive 0s or 1s is 2*F*_{n}. For example, out of the 16 binary strings of length 4, there are 2*F*_{4}= 6 without an even number of consecutive 0s or 1s – they are 0001, 0111, 0101, 1000, 1010, 1110. There is an equivalent statement about subsets.

### Sequence properties

The first 21 Fibonacci numbers *F _{n}* are:

^{[2]}

*F*_{0}*F*_{1}*F*_{2}*F*_{3}*F*_{4}*F*_{5}*F*_{6}*F*_{7}*F*_{8}*F*_{9}*F*_{10}*F*_{11}*F*_{12}*F*_{13}*F*_{14}*F*_{15}*F*_{16}*F*_{17}*F*_{18}*F*_{19}*F*_{20}0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765

The sequence can also be extended to negative index *n* using the re-arranged recurrence relation

which yields the sequence of "negafibonacci" numbers^{[49]} satisfying

Thus the bidirectional sequence is

*F*_{−8}*F*_{−7}*F*_{−6}*F*_{−5}*F*_{−4}*F*_{−3}*F*_{−2}*F*_{−1}*F*_{0}*F*_{1}*F*_{2}*F*_{3}*F*_{4}*F*_{5}*F*_{6}*F*_{7}*F*_{8}−21 13 −8 5 −3 2 −1 1 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21

### Relation to the golden ratio

#### Closed-form expression

Like every sequence defined by a linear recurrence with constant coefficients, the Fibonacci numbers have a closed form expression. It has become known as **Binet's formula**, named after French mathematician Jacques Philippe Marie Binet, though it was already known by Abraham de Moivre and Daniel Bernoulli:^{[50]}

where

is the golden ratio (OEIS: A001622), and

^{[51]}

Since , this formula can also be written as

To see this,^{[52]} note that φ and ψ are both solutions of the equations

so the powers of φ and ψ satisfy the Fibonacci recursion. In other words,

and

It follows that for any values *a* and *b*, the sequence defined by

satisfies the same recurrence

If *a* and *b* are chosen so that *U*_{0} = 0 and *U*_{1} = 1 then the resulting sequence *U*_{n} must be the Fibonacci sequence. This is the same as requiring *a* and *b* satisfy the system of equations:

which has solution

producing the required formula.

Taking the starting values *U*_{0} and *U*_{1} to be arbitrary constants, a more general solution is:

where

- .

#### Computation by rounding

Since

for all *n* ≥ 0, the number *F*_{n} is the closest integer to . Therefore, it can be found by rounding, using the nearest integer function:

In fact, the rounding error is very small, being less than 0.1 for *n* ≥ 4, and less than 0.01 for *n* ≥ 8.

Fibonacci number can also be computed by truncation, in terms of the floor function:

As the floor function is monotonic, the latter formula can be inverted for finding the index *n*(*F*) of the largest Fibonacci number that is not greater than a real number *F* > 1:

where

#### Limit of consecutive quotients

Johannes Kepler observed that the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers converges. He wrote that "as 5 is to 8 so is 8 to 13, practically, and as 8 is to 13, so is 13 to 21 almost", and concluded that these ratios approach the golden ratio ^{[53]}^{[54]}

This convergence holds regardless of the starting values, excluding 0 and 0, or any pair in the conjugate golden ratio, ^{[clarification needed]} This can be verified using Binet's formula. For example, the initial values 3 and 2 generate the sequence 3, 2, 5, 7, 12, 19, 31, 50, 81, 131, 212, 343, 555, ... The ratio of consecutive terms in this sequence shows the same convergence towards the golden ratio.

#### Decomposition of powers

Since the golden ratio satisfies the equation

this expression can be used to decompose higher powers as a linear function of lower powers, which in turn can be decomposed all the way down to a linear combination of and 1. The resulting recurrence relationships yield Fibonacci numbers as the linear coefficients:

This equation can be proved by induction on *n*.

This expression is also true for *n* < 1 if the Fibonacci sequence *F _{n}* is extended to negative integers using the Fibonacci rule

### Matrix form

A 2-dimensional system of linear difference equations that describes the Fibonacci sequence is

alternatively denoted

which yields . The eigenvalues of the matrix **A** are and corresponding to the respective eigenvectors

and

As the initial value is

it follows that the nth term is

From this, the nth element in the Fibonacci series may be read off directly as a closed-form expression:

Equivalently, the same computation may performed by diagonalization of **A** through use of its eigendecomposition:

where and The closed-form expression for the nth element in the Fibonacci series is therefore given by

which again yields

The matrix **A** has a determinant of −1, and thus it is a 2×2 unimodular matrix.

This property can be understood in terms of the continued fraction representation for the golden ratio:

The Fibonacci numbers occur as the ratio of successive convergents of the continued fraction for φ, and the matrix formed from successive convergents of any continued fraction has a determinant of +1 or −1. The matrix representation gives the following closed-form expression for the Fibonacci numbers:

Taking the determinant of both sides of this equation yields Cassini's identity,

Moreover, since **A**^{n} **A**^{m} = **A**^{n+m} for any square matrix **A**, the following identities can be derived (they are obtained from two different coefficients of the matrix product, and one may easily deduce the second one from the first one by changing *n* into *n* + 1),

In particular, with *m* = *n*,

These last two identities provide a way to compute Fibonacci numbers recursively in *O*(log(*n*)) arithmetic operations and in time *O*(*M*(*n*) log(*n*)), where *M*(*n*) is the time for the multiplication of two numbers of *n* digits. This matches the time for computing the *n*th Fibonacci number from the closed-form matrix formula, but with fewer redundant steps if one avoids recomputing an already computed Fibonacci number (recursion with memoization).^{[55]}

### Identification

The question may arise whether a positive integer *x* is a Fibonacci number. This is true if and only if at least one of or is a perfect square.^{[56]} This is because Binet's formula above can be rearranged to give

which allows one to find the position in the sequence of a given Fibonacci number.

This formula must return an integer for all *n*, so the radical expression must be an integer (otherwise the logarithm does not even return a rational number).

### Combinatorial identities

Most identities involving Fibonacci numbers can be proved using combinatorial arguments using the fact that *F*_{n} can be interpreted as the number of sequences of 1s and 2s that sum to *n* − 1. This can be taken as the definition of *F*_{n}, with the convention that *F*_{0} = 0, meaning no sum adds up to −1, and that *F*_{1} = 1, meaning the empty sum "adds up" to 0. Here, the order of the summand matters. For example, 1 + 2 and 2 + 1 are considered two different sums.

For example, the recurrence relation

or in words, the *n*th Fibonacci number is the sum of the previous two Fibonacci numbers, may be shown by dividing the *F*_{n} sums of 1s and 2s that add to *n* − 1 into two non-overlapping groups. One group contains those sums whose first term is 1 and the other those sums whose first term is 2. In the first group the remaining terms add to *n* − 2, so it has *F*_{n-1} sums, and in the second group the remaining terms add to *n* − 3, so there are *F*_{n−2} sums. So there are a total of *F*_{n−1} + *F*_{n−2} sums altogether, showing this is equal to *F*_{n}.

Similarly, it may be shown that the sum of the first Fibonacci numbers up to the *n*th is equal to the (*n* + 2)-nd Fibonacci number minus 1.^{[57]} In symbols:

This is done by dividing the sums adding to *n* + 1 in a different way, this time by the location of the first 2. Specifically, the first group consists of those sums that start with 2, the second group those that start 1 + 2, the third 1 + 1 + 2, and so on, until the last group, which consists of the single sum where only 1's are used. The number of sums in the first group is *F*(*n*), *F*(*n* − 1) in the second group, and so on, with 1 sum in the last group. So the total number of sums is *F*(*n*) + *F*(*n* − 1) + ... + *F*(1) + 1 and therefore this quantity is equal to *F*(*n* + 2).

A similar argument, grouping the sums by the position of the first 1 rather than the first 2, gives two more identities:

and

In words, the sum of the first Fibonacci numbers with odd index up to *F*_{2n−1} is the (2*n*)th Fibonacci number, and the sum of the first Fibonacci numbers with even index up to *F*_{2n} is the (2*n* + 1)th Fibonacci number minus 1.^{[58]}

A different trick may be used to prove

or in words, the sum of the squares of the first Fibonacci numbers up to *F*_{n} is the product of the *n*th and (*n* + 1)th Fibonacci numbers. In this case Fibonacci rectangle of size *F*_{n} by *F*(*n* + 1) can be decomposed into squares of size *F*_{n}, *F*_{n−1}, and so on to *F*_{1} = 1, from which the identity follows by comparing areas.

#### Symbolic method

The sequence is also considered using the symbolic method.^{[59]} More precisely, this sequence corresponds to a specifiable combinatorial class. The specification of this sequence is . Indeed, as stated above, the -th Fibonacci number equals the number of combinatorial compositions (ordered partitions) of using terms 1 and 2.

It follows that the ordinary generating function of the Fibonacci sequence, i.e. , is the complex function .

### Other identities

Numerous other identities can be derived using various methods. Some of the most noteworthy are:^{[60]}

#### Cassini's and Catalan's identities

Cassini's identity states that

Catalan's identity is a generalization:

#### d'Ocagne's identity

where *L*_{n} is the *n'*th Lucas number. The last is an identity for doubling *n*; other identities of this type are

by Cassini's identity.

These can be found experimentally using lattice reduction, and are useful in setting up the special number field sieve to factorize a Fibonacci number.

More generally,^{[60]}

or alternatively

Putting *k* = 2 in this formula, one gets again the formulas of the end of above section Matrix form.

### Power series

The generating function of the Fibonacci sequence is the power series

This series is convergent for and its sum has a simple closed-form:^{[61]}

This can be proved by using the Fibonacci recurrence to expand each coefficient in the infinite sum:

Solving the equation

for *s*(*x*) results in the above closed form.

Setting *x* = 1/*k*, the closed form of the series becomes

In particular, if k is an integer greater than 1, then this series converges. Further setting *k* = 10^{m} yields

for all positive integers m.

Some math puzzle-books present as curious the particular value that comes from *m* = 1, which is ^{[62]} Similarly, *m* = 2 gives

### Reciprocal sums

Infinite sums over reciprocal Fibonacci numbers can sometimes be evaluated in terms of theta functions. For example, we can write the sum of every odd-indexed reciprocal Fibonacci number as

and the sum of squared reciprocal Fibonacci numbers as

If we add 1 to each Fibonacci number in the first sum, there is also the closed form

and there is a *nested* sum of squared Fibonacci numbers giving the reciprocal of the golden ratio,

No closed formula for the reciprocal Fibonacci constant

is known, but the number has been proved irrational by Richard André-Jeannin.^{[63]}

The **Millin series** gives the identity^{[64]}

which follows from the closed form for its partial sums as *N* tends to infinity:

### Primes and divisibility

#### Divisibility properties

Every third number of the sequence is even and more generally, every *k*th number of the sequence is a multiple of *F _{k}*. Thus the Fibonacci sequence is an example of a divisibility sequence. In fact, the Fibonacci sequence satisfies the stronger divisibility property

^{[65]}

^{[66]}

Any three consecutive Fibonacci numbers are pairwise coprime, which means that, for every *n*,

- gcd(
*F*_{n},*F*_{n+1}) = gcd(*F*_{n},*F*_{n+2}) = gcd(*F*_{n+1},*F*_{n+2}) = 1.

Every prime number *p* divides a Fibonacci number that can be determined by the value of *p* modulo 5. If *p* is congruent to 1 or 4 (mod 5), then *p* divides *F*_{p − 1}, and if *p* is congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5), then, *p* divides *F*_{p + 1}. The remaining case is that *p* = 5, and in this case *p* divides *F*_{p}.

These cases can be combined into a single, non-piecewise formula, using the Legendre symbol:^{[67]}

#### Primality testing

The above formula can be used as a primality test in the sense that if

where the Legendre symbol has been replaced by the Jacobi symbol, then this is evidence that *n* is a prime, and if it fails to hold, then *n* is definitely not a prime. If *n* is composite and satisfies the formula, then *n* is a *Fibonacci pseudoprime*. When *m* is large – say a 500-bit number – then we can calculate *F*_{m} (mod *n*) efficiently using the matrix form. Thus

Here the matrix power *A*^{m} is calculated using modular exponentiation, which can be adapted to matrices.^{[68]}

#### Fibonacci primes

A *Fibonacci prime* is a Fibonacci number that is prime. The first few are:

Fibonacci primes with thousands of digits have been found, but it is not known whether there are infinitely many.^{[69]}

*F*_{kn} is divisible by *F*_{n}, so, apart from *F*_{4} = 3, any Fibonacci prime must have a prime index. As there are arbitrarily long runs of composite numbers, there are therefore also arbitrarily long runs of composite Fibonacci numbers.

No Fibonacci number greater than *F*_{6} = 8 is one greater or one less than a prime number.^{[70]}

The only nontrivial square Fibonacci number is 144.^{[71]} Attila Pethő proved in 2001 that there is only a finite number of perfect power Fibonacci numbers.^{[72]} In 2006, Y. Bugeaud, M. Mignotte, and S. Siksek proved that 8 and 144 are the only such non-trivial perfect powers.^{[73]}

1, 3, 21, 55 are the only triangular Fibonacci numbers, which was conjectured by Vern Hoggatt and proved by Luo Ming.^{[74]}

No Fibonacci number can be a perfect number.^{[75]} More generally, no Fibonaci number other than 1 can be multiply perfect,^{[76]} and no ratio of two Fibonacci numbers can be perfect.^{[77]}

#### Prime divisors

With the exceptions of 1, 8 and 144 (*F*_{1} = *F*_{2}, *F*_{6} and *F*_{12}) every Fibonacci number has a prime factor that is not a factor of any smaller Fibonacci number (Carmichael's theorem).^{[78]} As a result, 8 and 144 (*F*_{6} and *F*_{12}) are the only Fibonacci numbers that are the product of other Fibonacci numbers OEIS: A235383.

The divisibility of Fibonacci numbers by a prime *p* is related to the Legendre symbol which is evaluated as follows:

If *p* is a prime number then

^{[79]}^{[80]}

For example,

It is not known whether there exists a prime *p* such that

Such primes (if there are any) would be called Wall–Sun–Sun primes.

Also, if *p* ≠ 5 is an odd prime number then:^{[81]}

**Example 1.** *p* = 7, in this case *p* ≡ 3 (mod 4) and we have:

**Example 2.** *p* = 11, in this case *p* ≡ 3 (mod 4) and we have:

**Example 3.** *p* = 13, in this case *p* ≡ 1 (mod 4) and we have:

**Example 4.** *p* = 29, in this case *p* ≡ 1 (mod 4) and we have:

For odd *n*, all odd prime divisors of *F*_{n} are congruent to 1 modulo 4, implying that all odd divisors of *F*_{n} (as the products of odd prime divisors) are congruent to 1 modulo 4.^{[82]}

For example,

All known factors of Fibonacci numbers *F*(*i*) for all *i* < 50000 are collected at the relevant repositories.^{[83]}^{[84]}

#### Periodicity modulo *n*

If the members of the Fibonacci sequence are taken mod *n*, the resulting sequence is periodic with period at most *6n*.^{[85]} The lengths of the periods for various *n* form the so-called Pisano periods OEIS: A001175. Determining a general formula for the Pisano periods is an open problem, which includes as a subproblem a special instance of the problem of finding the multiplicative order of a modular integer or of an element in a finite field. However, for any particular *n*, the Pisano period may be found as an instance of cycle detection.

### Right triangles

Starting with 5, every second Fibonacci number is the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle with integer sides, or in other words, the largest number in a Pythagorean triple. The length of the longer leg of this triangle is equal to the sum of the three sides of the preceding triangle in this series of triangles, and the shorter leg is equal to the difference between the preceding bypassed Fibonacci number and the shorter leg of the preceding triangle.

The first triangle in this series has sides of length 5, 4, and 3. Skipping 8, the next triangle has sides of length 13, 12 (5 + 4 + 3), and 5 (8 − 3). Skipping 21, the next triangle has sides of length 34, 30 (13 + 12 + 5), and 16 (21 − 5). This series continues indefinitely. The triangle sides *a*, *b*, *c* can be calculated directly:

These formulas satisfy for all *n*, but they only represent triangle sides when *n* > 2.

Any four consecutive Fibonacci numbers *F*_{n}, *F*_{n+1}, *F*_{n+2} and *F*_{n+3} can also be used to generate a Pythagorean triple in a different way:^{[86]}

These formulas satisfy for all *n*, but they only represent triangle sides when *n* > 0.

### Magnitude

Since *F _{n}* is asymptotic to , the number of digits in

*F*

_{n}is asymptotic to . As a consequence, for every integer

*d*> 1 there are either 4 or 5 Fibonacci numbers with

*d*decimal digits.

More generally, in the base *b* representation, the number of digits in *F*_{n} is asymptotic to

### Generalizations

The Fibonacci sequence is one of the simplest and earliest known sequences defined by a recurrence relation, and specifically by a linear difference equation. All these sequences may be viewed as generalizations of the Fibonacci sequence. In particular, Binet's formula may be generalized to any sequence that is a solution of a homogeneous linear difference equation with constant coefficients.

Some specific examples that are close, in some sense, from Fibonacci sequence include:

- Generalizing the index to negative integers to produce the negafibonacci numbers.
- Generalizing the index to real numbers using a modification of Binet's formula.
^{[60]} - Starting with other integers. Lucas numbers have
*L*_{1}= 1,*L*_{2}= 3, and*L*=_{n}*L*_{n−1}+*L*_{n−2}. Primefree sequences use the Fibonacci recursion with other starting points to generate sequences in which all numbers are composite. - Letting a number be a linear function (other than the sum) of the 2 preceding numbers. The Pell numbers have
*P*= 2_{n}*P*_{n − 1}+*P*_{n − 2}. If the coefficient of the preceding value is assigned a variable value*x*, the result is the sequence of Fibonacci polynomials. - Not adding the immediately preceding numbers. The Padovan sequence and Perrin numbers have
*P*(*n*) =*P*(*n*− 2) +*P*(*n*− 3). - Generating the next number by adding 3 numbers (tribonacci numbers), 4 numbers (tetranacci numbers), or more. The resulting sequences are known as
*n-Step Fibonacci numbers*.^{[87]}

## See also

## References

**Footnotes**

**^**"For four, variations of meters of two [and] three being mixed, five happens. For five, variations of two earlier – three [and] four, being mixed, eight is obtained. In this way, for six, [variations] of four [and] of five being mixed, thirteen happens. And like that, variations of two earlier meters being mixed, seven morae [is] twenty-one. In this way, the process should be followed in all mātrā-vṛttas"^{[13]}

**Citations**

**^**Lucas 1891, p. 3.- ^
^{a}^{b}Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence A000045".*The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences*. OEIS Foundation. **^**Beck & Geoghegan 2010.**^**Bóna 2011, p. 180.- ^
^{a}^{b}Pisano 2002, pp. 404–05. - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Goonatilake, Susantha (1998),*Toward a Global Science*, Indiana University Press, p. 126, ISBN 978-0-253-33388-9 - ^
^{a}^{b}Singh, Parmanand (1985), "The So-called Fibonacci numbers in ancient and medieval India",*Historia Mathematica*,**12**(3): 229–44, doi:10.1016/0315-0860(85)90021-7 - ^
^{a}^{b}Knuth, Donald (2006),*The Art of Computer Programming*, 4. Generating All Trees – History of Combinatorial Generation, Addison–Wesley, p. 50, ISBN 978-0-321-33570-8,it was natural to consider the set of all sequences of [L] and [S] that have exactly m beats. ...there are exactly Fm+1 of them. For example the 21 sequences when

*m*= 7 are: [gives list]. In this way Indian prosodists were led to discover the Fibonacci sequence, as we have observed in Section 1.2.8 (from v.1) **^**Knuth, Donald (1968),*The Art of Computer Programming*,**1**, Addison Wesley, p. 100, ISBN 978-81-7758-754-8,Before Fibonacci wrote his work, the sequence Fn had already been discussed by Indian scholars, who had long been interested in rhythmic patterns... both Gopala (before 1135 AD) and Hemachandra (c. 1150) mentioned the numbers 1,2,3,5,8,13,21 explicitly [see P. Singh Historia Math 12 (1985) 229–44]" p. 100 (3d ed)...

- ^
^{a}^{b}Livio 2003, p. 197. **^**Agrawala, VS (1969),*Pāṇinikālīna Bhāratavarṣa**(Hn.). Varanasi-I: TheChowkhamba Vidyabhawan*,SadgurushiShya writes that Pingala was a younger brother of Pāṇini [Agrawala 1969, lb]. There is an alternative opinion that he was a maternal uncle of Pāṇini [Vinayasagar 1965, Preface, 121]. ... Agrawala [1969, 463–76], after a careful investigation, in which he considered the views of earlier scholars, has concluded that Pāṇini lived between 480 and 410 BC

**^**Singh, Parmanand (1985). "The So-called Fibonacci Numbers in Ancient and Medieval India" (PDF).*Historia Mathematica*. Academic Press.**12**(3): 232. doi:10.1016/0315-0860(85)90021-7.**^**Velankar, HD (1962),*'Vṛttajātisamuccaya' of kavi Virahanka*, Jodhpur: Rajasthan Oriental Research Institute, p. 101**^**Livio 2003, p. 197–98.**^**Shah, Jayant (1991). "A History of Piṅgala's Combinatorics" (PDF).*Northeastern University*: 41. Retrieved 4 January 2019.**^**"Fibonacci's Liber Abaci (Book of Calculation)".*The University of Utah*. 13 December 2009. Retrieved 28 November 2018.**^**Hemenway, Priya (2005).*Divine Proportion: Phi In Art, Nature, and Science*. New York: Sterling. pp. 20–21. ISBN 1-4027-3522-7.**^**Knott, Dr. Ron (25 September 2016). "The Fibonacci Numbers and Golden section in Nature – 1".*University of Surrey*. Retrieved 27 November 2018.**^**Knott, Ron. "Fibonacci's Rabbits". University of Surrey Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences.**^**Gardner, Martin (1996),*Mathematical Circus*, The Mathematical Association of America, p. 153, ISBN 978-0-88385-506-5,It is ironic that Leonardo, who made valuable contributions to mathematics, is remembered today mainly because a 19th-century French number theorist, Édouard Lucas... attached the name Fibonacci to a number sequence that appears in a trivial problem in Liber abaci

**^**Knuth, Donald E (1997),*The Art of Computer Programming*, 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd ed.), Addison–Wesley, p. 343, ISBN 978-0-201-89683-1**^**Brasch, T. von; Byström, J.; Lystad, L.P. (2012), "Optimal Control and the Fibonacci Sequence",*Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications*,**154**(3): 857–78, doi:10.1007/s10957-012-0061-2, hdl:11250/180781**^**Harizanov, Valentina (1995), "Review of Yuri V. Matiyasevich,*Hibert's Tenth Problem*",*Modern Logic*,**5**(3): 345–55.**^**Avriel, M; Wilde, DJ (1966), "Optimality of the Symmetric Fibonacci Search Technique",*Fibonacci Quarterly*(3): 265–69**^***Amiga ROM Kernel Reference Manual*, Addison–Wesley, 1991**^**"IFF",*Multimedia Wiki***^**"Zeckendorf representation",*Encyclopedia of Math***^**Livio 2003, pp. 98–99.**^**Livio 2003, p. 176.**^**Stephenson, Kenneth (2005),*Introduction to Circle Packing: The Theory of Discrete Analytic Functions*, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-82356-2, MR 2131318; see especially Lemma 8.2 (Ring Lemma), pp. 73–74, and Appendix B, The Ring Lemma, pp. 318–321.**^**Livio 2003, p. 193.**^**Douady, S; Couder, Y (1996), "Phyllotaxis as a Dynamical Self Organizing Process" (PDF),*Journal of Theoretical Biology*,**178**(3): 255–74, doi:10.1006/jtbi.1996.0026, archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-05-26**^**Jones, Judy; Wilson, William (2006), "Science",*An Incomplete Education*, Ballantine Books, p. 544, ISBN 978-0-7394-7582-9**^**Brousseau, A (1969), "Fibonacci Statistics in Conifers",*Fibonacci Quarterly*(7): 525–32**^**"Marks for the da Vinci Code: B–".*Maths*. Computer Science For Fun: CS4FN.**^**Scott, T.C.; Marketos, P. (March 2014),*On the Origin of the Fibonacci Sequence*(PDF), MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St Andrews**^**Livio 2003, p. 110.**^**Livio 2003, pp. 112–13.**^**"The Secret of the Fibonacci Sequence in Trees".*American Museum of Natural History*. 2011. Archived from the original on 4 May 2013. Retrieved 4 February 2019.**^**Prusinkiewicz, Przemyslaw; Hanan, James (1989),*Lindenmayer Systems, Fractals, and Plants (Lecture Notes in Biomathematics)*, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-97092-9**^**Vogel, Helmut (1979), "A better way to construct the sunflower head",*Mathematical Biosciences*,**44**(3–4): 179–89, doi:10.1016/0025-5564(79)90080-4**^**Livio 2003, p. 112.**^**Prusinkiewicz, Przemyslaw; Lindenmayer, Aristid (1990), "4",*The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants*, Springer-Verlag, pp. 101–107, ISBN 978-0-387-97297-8**^**"The Fibonacci sequence as it appears in nature" (PDF),*The Fibonacci Quarterly*,**1**(1): 53–56, 1963- ^
^{a}^{b}Hutchison, Luke (September 2004). "Growing the Family Tree: The Power of DNA in Reconstructing Family Relationships" (PDF).*Proceedings of the First Symposium on Bioinformatics and Biotechnology (BIOT-04)*. Retrieved 2016-09-03. **^**Hameroff, Stuart; Penrose, Roger (March 2014). "Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory".*Physics of Life Reviews*. Elsevier.**11**(1): 39–78. Bibcode:2014PhLRv..11...39H. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002. PMID 24070914.**^**Lucas 1891, p. 7.**^**Stanley, Richard (2011).*Enumerative Combinatorics I (2nd ed.)*. Cambridge Univ. Press. p. 121, Ex 1.35. ISBN 978-1-107-60262-5.**^**Knuth, Donald (2008-12-11), "Negafibonacci Numbers and the Hyperbolic Plane",*Annual meeting*, The Fairmont Hotel, San Jose, CA: The Mathematical Association of America**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Binet's Fibonacci Number Formula".*MathWorld*.**^**Ball 2003, p. 156.**^**Ball 2003, pp. 155–6.**^**Kepler, Johannes (1966),*A New Year Gift: On Hexagonal Snow*, Oxford University Press, p. 92, ISBN 978-0-19-858120-8**^***Strena seu de Nive Sexangula*, 1611**^**Dijkstra, Edsger W. (1978),*In honour of Fibonacci*(PDF)**^**Gessel, Ira (October 1972), "Fibonacci is a Square" (PDF),*The Fibonacci Quarterly*,**10**(4): 417–19, retrieved April 11, 2012**^**Lucas 1891, p. 4.**^**Vorobiev, Nikolaĭ Nikolaevich; Martin, Mircea (2002), "Chapter 1",*Fibonacci Numbers*, Birkhäuser, pp. 5–6, ISBN 978-3-7643-6135-8**^**Flajolet, Philippe; Sedgewick, Robert (2009).*Analytic Combinatorics*. Cambridge University Press. p. 42. ISBN 978-0521898065.- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Weisstein, Eric W. "Fibonacci Number".*MathWorld*. **^**Glaister, P (1995), "Fibonacci power series",*The Mathematical Gazette*,**79**(486): 521–25, doi:10.2307/3618079, JSTOR 3618079**^**Köhler, Günter (February 1985), "Generating functions of Fibonacci-like sequences and decimal expansions of some fractions" (PDF),*The Fibonacci Quarterly*,**23**(1): 29–35, retrieved December 31, 2011**^**André-Jeannin, Richard (1989), "Irrationalité de la somme des inverses de certaines suites récurrentes",*Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I*,**308**(19): 539–41, MR 0999451**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Millin Series".*MathWorld*.**^**Ribenboim, Paulo (2000),*My Numbers, My Friends*, Springer-Verlag**^**Su, Francis E (2000), "Fibonacci GCD's, please",*Mudd Math Fun Facts*, et al, HMC, archived from the original on 2009-12-14, retrieved 2007-02-23**^**Williams, H. C. (1982), "A note on the Fibonacci quotient ",*Canadian Mathematical Bulletin*,**25**(3): 366–70, doi:10.4153/CMB-1982-053-0, hdl:10338.dmlcz/137492, MR 0668957. Williams calls this property "well known".**^***Prime Numbers*, Richard Crandall, Carl Pomerance, Springer, second edition, 2005, p. 142.**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Fibonacci Prime".*MathWorld*.**^**Honsberger, Ross (1985), "Mathematical Gems III",*AMS Dolciani Mathematical Expositions*(9): 133, ISBN 978-0-88385-318-4**^**Cohn, JHE (1964), "Square Fibonacci Numbers etc",*Fibonacci Quarterly*,**2**: 109–13**^**Pethő, Attila (2001), "Diophantine properties of linear recursive sequences II",*Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyíregyháziensis*,**17**: 81–96**^**Bugeaud, Y; Mignotte, M; Siksek, S (2006), "Classical and modular approaches to exponential Diophantine equations. I. Fibonacci and Lucas perfect powers",*Ann. Math.*,**2**(163): 969–1018, arXiv:math/0403046, Bibcode:2004math......3046B, doi:10.4007/annals.2006.163.969**^**Ming, Luo (1989), "On triangular Fibonacci numbers" (PDF),*Fibonacci Quart.*,**27**(2): 98–108**^**Luca, Florian (2000). "Perfect Fibonacci and Lucas numbers".*Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo*.**49**(2): 313–18. doi:10.1007/BF02904236. ISSN 1973-4409. MR 1765401.**^**Broughan, Kevin A.; González, Marcos J.; Lewis, Ryan H.; Luca, Florian; Mejía Huguet, V. Janitzio; Togbé, Alain (2011). "There are no multiply-perfect Fibonacci numbers".*Integers*.**11a**: A7. MR 2988067.**^**Luca, Florian; Mejía Huguet, V. Janitzio (2010). "On Perfect numbers which are ratios of two Fibonacci numbers".*Annales Mathematicae at Informaticae*.**37**: 107–24. ISSN 1787-6117. MR 2753031.**^**Knott, Ron,*The Fibonacci numbers*, UK: Surrey**^**Ribenboim, Paulo (1996),*The New Book of Prime Number Records*, New York: Springer, p. 64, ISBN 978-0-387-94457-9**^**Lemmermeyer 2000, pp. 73–74, ex. 2.25–28.**^**Lemmermeyer 2000, pp. 73–74, ex. 2.28.**^**Lemmermeyer 2000, p. 73, ex. 2.27.**^***Fibonacci and Lucas factorizations*, Mersennus collects all known factors of*F*(*i*) with*i*< 10000.**^***Factors of Fibonacci and Lucas numbers*, Red golpe collects all known factors of*F*(*i*) with 10000 <*i*< 50000.**^**Freyd, Peter; Brown, Kevin S. (1993), "Problems and Solutions: Solutions: E3410",*The American Mathematical Monthly*,**99**(3): 278–79, doi:10.2307/2325076, JSTOR 2325076**^**Koshy, Thomas (2007),*Elementary number theory with applications*, Academic Press, p. 581, ISBN 978-0-12-372487-8**^**Weisstein, Eric W. "Fibonacci*n*-Step Number".*MathWorld*.

### Works cited

- Ball, Keith M (2003), "8: Fibonacci's Rabbits Revisited",
*Strange Curves, Counting Rabbits, and Other Mathematical Explorations*, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, ISBN 978-0-691-11321-0. - Beck, Matthias; Geoghegan, Ross (2010),
*The Art of Proof: Basic Training for Deeper Mathematics*, New York: Springer, ISBN 978-1-4419-7022-0. - Bóna, Miklós (2011),
*A Walk Through Combinatorics*(3rd ed.), New Jersey: World Scientific, ISBN 978-981-4335-23-2.- Bóna, Miklós (2016),
*A Walk Through Combinatorics*(4th Revised ed.), New Jersey: World Scientific, ISBN 978-981-3148-84-0.

- Bóna, Miklós (2016),
- Lemmermeyer, Franz (2000),
*Reciprocity Laws: From Euler to Eisenstein*, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, New York: Springer, ISBN 978-3-540-66957-9. - Livio, Mario (2003) [2002].
*The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number*(First trade paperback ed.). New York City: Broadway Books. ISBN 0-7679-0816-3.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) - Lucas, Édouard (1891),
*Théorie des nombres*(in French),**1**, Paris: Gauthier-Villars, https://books.google.com/books?id=_hsPAAAAIAAJ. - Pisano, Leonardo (2002),
*Fibonacci's Liber Abaci: A Translation into Modern English of the Book of Calculation*, Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, Sigler, Laurence E, trans, Springer, ISBN 978-0-387-95419-6

## External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Fibonacci number |

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Fibonacci number program |