This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
dbx is a family of noise reduction systems developed by the company of the same name. The most common implementations are dbx Type I and dbx Type II for analog tape recording and, less commonly, vinyl LPs. A separate implementation, known as dbx-TV, is part of the MTS system used to provide stereo sound to North American and certain other TV systems. The company – dbx, Inc. – was also involved with Dynamic Noise Reduction (DNR) systems.
- 1 History
- 2 How dbx works
- 3 dbx artifacts
- 4 Lack of dbx acceptance in marketplace
- 5 dbx with vinyl phonograph records
- 6 dbx with pro reel tape recorders
- 7 dbx for television
- 8 dbx in film production
- 9 dbx for program delivery via the American NPR Public Radio Satellite System
- 10 See also
- 11 References
- 12 Further reading
- 13 External links
The original dbx Type I and Type II systems were based on so-called "linear decibel companding" - compressing the signal on recording and expanding it on playback. It was invented by David E. Blackmer of dbx, Inc. in 1971.
A miniature dbx Type II decoder on an integrated circuit was created in 1982 for use in portable and car audio, although only a few devices took advantage of it, such as certain Panasonic portable cassette players and Sanyo car stereos. dbx marketed the PPA-1 Silencer, a decoder that could be used with non-dbx players such as the Sony Walkman. A version of this chip also contained a Dolby B-compatible noise reduction decoder, described as dbx Type B noise reduction; this was possible after the Dolby patent (but not the trademark) had expired.
How dbx works
dbx Type I and Type II are types of "companding noise reduction". Companding noise reduction works by first compressing the source material's dynamic range (in this case by a factor of two) in anticipation of being recorded on a relatively noisy medium (magnetic tape, for example).
- Upon playback, the encoded material, now contaminated with noise, is passed through an expander which restores the original dynamic range of the source material.
- The contaminating signal (tape hiss) is heavily attenuated and/or "masked" by the dynamic expansion process, resulting in a significant reduction in perceived noise.
Because dbx Type I and Type II are broadband (single-band) companders (unlike Dolby-A's four bands), they are susceptible to audible noise modulation and other artifacts. To deal with this, both Type I and II use very strong high-frequency pre-emphasis of the audio signal in both the recording path and the control signal path. This causes the compander to 'back off' the gain in certain circumstances and reduce the audibility of noise modulation – even with this pre-emphasis, noise modulation can become audible when using very noisy media to begin with, such as the Compact Cassette format. In the control signal path, the dbx Type II process rolls off the high and low frequency response to desensitize the system to frequency response errors – since the roll-off is only in the control path, it does not affect the audible sound.
The dbx Type-II "disc" setting on consumer dbx decoders adds an additional 1–3 dB of low-frequency roll-off in both the audio path and control path. This protects the system from audible mistracking due to record warps and low-frequency rumble.
The dbx Type I system is meant to be used with recording media that have a S/N, before noise reduction, of at least 60 dB and a -3 dB frequency response of at least 30 Hz to 15 kHz. dbx Type-II is for more noisy media that have a lower S/N and much more restricted frequency response. Both systems use 2:1 companding and provide exactly the same amount of NR and dynamic range improvement – in other words, they provide the same end results, but are not at all compatible with each other.
A sometimes noticeable artifact of dbx was "breathing", as its compander rapidly increased and decreased the volume level of the background noise along with the music, which was most noticeable in quiet musical passages; this was a greater issue with dbx than with Dolby because its compander was more aggressive and worked across the frequency spectrum.
Lack of dbx acceptance in marketplace
Although it brought extraordinary dynamic range and lack of noise to the cassette tape medium, dbx noise reduction did not achieve widespread popularity in the consumer marketplace, as compressed recordings did not sound acceptable when played back on non-dbx equipment; Dolby B was already widely used when dbx was introduced. Although Dolby noise reduction also used some companding, the level of compression and expansion was very mild, so that the sound of Dolby-encoded tapes was acceptable to consumers when played back on non-Dolby equipment.
- dbx Type I was widely adopted in professional recording, particularly used with what is referred to in the industry as "semi-pro" formats such as half-inch 8 track and one-inch 16 track. Tascam incorporated dbx Type II in their Portastudio four-track cassette recorders.
- Tascam's Portastudio family of 4 track cassette recorders became a standard for home hobbyists.
- An advantage of dbx Type I and Type II compared to Dolby noise reduction is that it did not require calibration with the output level of the tape deck, which could cause incorrect tracking with Dolby B and C, leading to muffled high tones.
- However, due to dbx's high compression and strong high-frequency preemphasis, dbx-encoded tapes were, unlike Dolby B, practically unplayable on non-dbx systems, sounding very harsh when played back undecoded. Undecoded dbx playback also exhibited large amounts of dynamic error, with audio levels going up and down constantly.
While dbx Type-II NR was eventually designed into a self-contained LSI chip, it was never cheap due to the extremely high precision required of the dbx VCAs and the RMS signal analysis, leading to further reluctance of manufacturers to use the dbx chips in their products.
dbx with vinyl phonograph records
dbx was also used on vinyl records, which were known as dbx discs. While the earliest release is from 1971, their numbers peaked between 1977 until around 1982. Billboard noted in August 1981 that the total number of releases with dbx encoding was expected to approach 200 albums. When employed on LPs, the dbx Type-II system reduced the audibility of dust and scratches, reducing them to tiny pops and clicks (if they were audible at all) and also completely eliminated record surface noise. dbx encoded LPs had, in theory, a dynamic range of up to 90 dB. In addition, dbx LPs were produced from only the original master tapes, with no copies being used, and pressed only on heavy, virgin vinyl. Most were released in limited quantities with premium pricing.
dbx with pro reel tape recorders
The dbx k9 noise reduction card was designed to fit into the pro dolby-A series A-361 frames, already in wide use in pro reel-to-reel recording studios of the time. The dbx 192 was an elegant design made especially for the Nagra IV-Stereo recorder. It had a single push-button for record/playback encode/decode and was integrated directly into the Nagra's internal signal path. It drew power from the Nagra supply.
dbx for television
dbx-TV noise reduction, while having elements in common with Type I and Type II, is different in fundamental ways, and was developed by Mark Davis (then of dbx, now of Dolby Labs) in the early 1980s.
dbx-TV is included in multichannel television sound (MTS), the U.S. standard for stereo analog television transmission. Every TV device that decoded MTS originally required the payment of royalties, first to dbx, Inc., then to THAT Corporation which was spun off from dbx in 1989 and acquired its MTS patents in 1994; however, those patents expired worldwide in 2004.
dbx in film production
dbx noise reduction, capable of more than 20 dB of noise reduction, was used in the re-recording of the film Apocalypse Now in 1979. Dolby A-type noise reduction, capable of only 10-12 dB of noise reduction, was used only at the final stage for the mastering of the film's soundtrack to 70mm prints.
A modified version of dbx was also used in the Colortek stereo film system. In addition, dbx Type-II noise reduction was used in the Model-II and Model-III variants of MCA's Sensurround Special Effects System on the optical audio track and was a cornerstone of the entire system. MCA's Sensurround+Plus, used on the film Zoot Suit, employed dbx Type-II with the 4-track magnetic sound format on 35mm film prints, providing the motion picture with a stereo soundtrack capable of wide dynamic range and freedom from noise.
dbx for program delivery via the American NPR Public Radio Satellite System
The first generation Public Radio Satellite System (PRSS), introduced in 1979 and used by the American National Public Radio for delivery of network programming to their member stations via satellite, was a single channel per carrier (SCPC) system that had about 40 dB of analog (recovered) signal to noise. dbx modules that were set for 3:1 were used to increase the dynamic range of the system. Typically this worked well but for some low frequencies the distortion exceeded 10 percent THD. Also the dbx modules varied in how they tracked the compressed audio so the expanded audio was not an exact representation of what was compressed at the uplink. Still, the use of dbx allowed NPR to be known for its high fidelity standards on its satellite system as commercial broadcasters chose NPR to up-link a number of commercial radio music programs and concerts by commercial radio networks who demanded high fidelity in the analog era. Many of these problems were resolved when the PRSS moved to their second-generation system in 1994, the SOSS (Satellite Operations Support System), in which the feeds were sent digitally.
- Dolby noise reduction system
- High Com noise reduction system
- Dynamic Noise Reduction
- CX noise reduction system
- Hoffman, Frank W. (2004), Encyclopedia of Recorded Sound, 1 (revised ed.), Taylor & Francis
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-06-20. Retrieved 2016-02-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-08-17. Retrieved 2016-02-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- "14.0 Recording". Rec.audio. Frequently Asked Questions. Lundemo publishing. 2003. Archived from the original on 2004-10-12. Retrieved 2011-10-03.
- Nielsen Business Media, Inc. (1981-08-08). Billboard. Nielsen Business Media, Inc.
- "dbx SysInfo". audioinvest.no.
- dbx-TV Timeline (THAT Corporation) Archived 2011-07-16 at the Wayback Machine
- Copeland, Peter (February 2009) [September 2008]. Redlich, Gert (ed.). "Manual of Analoque Sound Restoration Techniques". London, UK: The British Library Sound Archive (www.bl.uk.). Chapter 9. Reciprocal noise reduction. Archived from the original on 2017-11-05. Retrieved 2017-11-05 – via Deutsches Hifi-Museum, Wiesbaden, Germany. (NB. Strongly biased from a British perspective, but nevertheless very knowledgeable.)
- "How This dbx Encoded Disc Was Produced - Card A". Archived from the original on 2017-11-05. Retrieved 2017-11-05. 
- "dbx Encoded Disc - Card B". Archived from the original on 2017-11-05. Retrieved 2017-11-05.
[…] The dbx Encoded Disc […] dbx encoded discs employ a unique encoding/decoding process that virtually eliminates record surface noise while dramatically increasing the dynamic range of the recording. The dbx disc is approximately 30 dB quieter than a conventional record. Also, the dynamic range of music on dbx encoded discs is equal to that experienced during the recording session, which represents a significant advantage over conventional records that have a limited dynamic range. Now, with dbx encoded discs, we can for the first time enjoy the full dynamic range and presence of music against a background of pure silence. The sound of a dbx encoded disc will generally be indistinguishable from that of the master tape or direct audio signal from which the record is made. Any extraneous noise that is present on the master tape will remain on these recordings since they are not affected by the dbx disc encode/decode process. Hence, the better the master tape from a noise point of view, the better the ultimate sound quality of the record. The audible benefits potentially available from recent and future improvements in sound recording (e.g. direct-to-disc and digital recording techniques) will be realized to their fullest extent only if the distraction of annoying record surface noise is eliminated. dbx encoded discs accomplish this objective. […]
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Dbx (noise reduction).|
- Audio Invest page on dbx
- Vintage dbx, the sound of the legend
- Retro HiFi: DBX Disc - The best thing you probably haven't heard