In combinatorics, **bijective proof** is a proof technique that finds a bijective function *f* : *A* → *B* between two finite sets *A* and *B*, or a size-preserving bijective function between two combinatorial classes, thus proving that they have the same number of elements, |*A*| = |*B*|. One place the technique is useful is where we wish to know the size of *A*, but can find no direct way of counting its elements. Then establishing a bijection from *A* to some *B* solves the problem in the case when *B* is more easily countable. Another useful feature of the technique is that the nature of the bijection itself often provides powerful insights into each or both of the sets.

## Contents

## Basic examples

### Proving the symmetry of the binomial coefficients

The symmetry of the binomial coefficients states that

This means there are exactly as many combinations of *k* in a set of *n* as there are combinations of *n* − *k* in a set of *n*.

#### The bijective proof

The key idea of the proof may be understood from a simple example: selecting out of a group of *n* children which *k* to reward with ice cream cones has exactly the same effect as choosing instead the *n* − *k* children to be denied them. More abstractly and generally, we note that the two quantities asserted to be equal count the subsets of size *k* and *n* − *k*, respectively, of any *n*-element set *S*. There is a simple bijection between the two families *F*_{k} and *F*_{n −��k} of subsets of *S*: it associates every *k*-element subset with its complement, which contains precisely the remaining *n* − *k* elements of *S*. Since *F*_{k} and *F*_{n − k} have the same number of elements, the corresponding binomial coefficients must be equal.

### Pascal's triangle recurrence relation

#### The bijective proof

*Proof*.
We count the number of ways to choose *k* elements from an *n*-set.
Again, by definition, the left hand side of the equation is the number of ways to choose *k* from *n*.
Since 1 ≤ *k* ≤ *n* − 1, we can pick a fixed element *e* from the *n*-set so that the remaining subset is not empty.
For each *k*-set, if *e* is chosen, there are

ways to choose the remaining *k* − 1 elements among the remaining *n* − 1 choices; otherwise, there are

ways to choose the remaining *k* elements among the remaining *n* − 1 choices. Thus, there are

ways to choose *k* elements depending on whether *e* is included in each selection, as in the right hand side expression.

## Other examples

Problems that admit combinatorial proofs are not limited to binomial coefficient identities. As the complexity of the problem increases, a combinatorial proof can become very sophisticated. This technique is particularly useful in areas of discrete mathematics such as combinatorics, graph theory, and number theory.

The most classical examples of bijective proofs in combinatorics include:

- Prüfer sequence, giving a proof of Cayley's formula for the number of labeled trees.
- Robinson-Schensted algorithm, giving a proof of Burnside's formula for the symmetric group.
- Conjugation of Young diagrams, giving a proof of a classical result on the number of certain integer partitions.
- Bijective proofs of the pentagonal number theorem.
- Bijective proofs of the formula for the Catalan numbers.

## See also

- Binomial theorem
- Schröder–Bernstein theorem
- Double counting (proof technique)
- Combinatorial principles
- Combinatorial proof
- Categorification

## External links

*"Division by three"*– by Doyle and Conway.*"A direct bijective proof of the hook-length formula"*– by Novelli, Pak and Stoyanovsky.*"Bijective census and random generation of Eulerian planar maps with prescribed vertex degrees"*– by Gilles Schaeffer.*"Kathy O'Hara's Constructive Proof of the Unimodality of the Gaussian Polynomials"*– by Doron Zeilberger.*"Partition Bijections, a Survey"*– by Igor Pak.- Garsia-Milne Involution Principle – from MathWorld.

## References

- Loehr, Nicholas A. (2011). Bijective Combinatorics. CRC Press. ISBN 143984884X, ISBN 978-1439848845.